1.6 or 1.7 roller rockers

ga94gt

Active Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2006
Messages
485
Reaction score
0
What is the dirrerence between the two? I need to know which to go with 1.6 or 1.7 roller rockers.

I will have AFR 165 and Trickflow stage 1 cam.
 

Z28 This

Active Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2006
Messages
458
Reaction score
1
The lobe lift of the cam is increased by the ratio of the rocker arm to produce the final amount of valve lift. A cam with a .320" lobe lift using a 1.50:1 ratio rocker arm will have a .480" valve lift (.320" x 1.50 = .480"). If you install rocker arms with an increased ratio of 1.60:1, with the same cam, the lift would increase to .512" (.320" x 1.60 = .512"). The engine reacts to the movement of the valve. It doesn't know how the increased lift was generated. It responds the same way it would as if a slightly larger lift cam had been installed. In fact, since the speed of the valve is increased with the higher rocker arm ratio, the engine thinks it has also gained 2? to 4? of camshaft duration.

The end result is an easy and quick way to improve the performance of the existing cam without having to install a new one. Remember, whenever you increase the valve lift, with either a bigger cam or larger rocker arm ratio, you must check for valve spring coil bind and for other mechanical interference

i hope i helped you :)
 

Z28 This

Active Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2006
Messages
458
Reaction score
1
also 1.7s seem to have more noise than 1.6s and some guys offset them with 1.6 on the exhaust side and 1.7 on the intake
 

ripper

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2007
Messages
3,323
Reaction score
2
Wow nice reply z28 you know your stuff. :thumb: Can i do this with a 4.6 also?
 

Forum statistics

Threads
77,510
Messages
1,504,050
Members
14,980
Latest member
TreeScholar

Members online

Top