Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Engine Specific Tech
94-95 5.0 - Specific
331 questions
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ryclef331" data-source="post: 97106" data-attributes="member: 8067"><p>First off, I'd be wary of someone saying a storker crank is "stock." He probably meant "cast." You need to be sure your info is correct and you know everything about that motor. </p><p></p><p>Second, you need to know EXACTLY what kind of pistons he is running...I'm talking down to the part #. Also the type of head gasket. As for the heads, I'd say the 200cc roush heads might be better off for you running NA but if he's running a dished piston (more than likely if he's claiming 8:1 CR), the motor is going to be a dog regardless. The Roush heads sound like a better head for that motor. The only benefit I see in running the performers is the fact that the aluminum is more resistant to retaining heat in the combustion chamber there by lessening your chances of detonation BUT if you make SURE you run 93 octane at all times, this is a moot point. The smaller runners and valves will boost low end tq but the motor will fall on its face above 4,500 rpms. </p><p></p><p>As for the compression, I can calculate it provided you know the part number of the piston OR how many cc's the dish of the piston has plus valve reliefs but with only a 4cc difference, it isn't going to go up much.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ryclef331, post: 97106, member: 8067"] First off, I'd be wary of someone saying a storker crank is "stock." He probably meant "cast." You need to be sure your info is correct and you know everything about that motor. Second, you need to know EXACTLY what kind of pistons he is running...I'm talking down to the part #. Also the type of head gasket. As for the heads, I'd say the 200cc roush heads might be better off for you running NA but if he's running a dished piston (more than likely if he's claiming 8:1 CR), the motor is going to be a dog regardless. The Roush heads sound like a better head for that motor. The only benefit I see in running the performers is the fact that the aluminum is more resistant to retaining heat in the combustion chamber there by lessening your chances of detonation BUT if you make SURE you run 93 octane at all times, this is a moot point. The smaller runners and valves will boost low end tq but the motor will fall on its face above 4,500 rpms. As for the compression, I can calculate it provided you know the part number of the piston OR how many cc's the dish of the piston has plus valve reliefs but with only a 4cc difference, it isn't going to go up much. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Random media
Latest posts
Lights Don’t Work
Latest: cobrajeff96
Today at 2:55 AM
94-95 5.0 - Specific
P
1994-1998 vs 1999-2004 seat differences?
Latest: PNW Mike
Yesterday at 11:59 PM
Exterior and Interior
New Here from Long Island NY
Latest: Daryl
Yesterday at 11:39 PM
New Member Introductions
What Did You Do To Your Car Today?
Latest: Daryl
Yesterday at 11:30 PM
The Garage
M
Convertible Top doesn't always work?
Latest: Mustang5L5
Yesterday at 8:56 PM
General Tech
Share this page
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Forum statistics
Threads
78,645
Messages
1,534,548
Members
15,977
Latest member
Jardon
Members online
cobrajeff96
Forums
Engine Specific Tech
94-95 5.0 - Specific
331 questions
Top