96mod289 said:well both of the ones that i looked at had superchargers (which i assumed the H.O. was for). Also I am deffinatly not new to stangs i just know a lot about 5.0's. I know 4.6's
Matt94GT said:5.0 is cheap, and easy to modify. the 4.6 can be a better/faster motor if you want to sink in lots of money. parts for 5.0 are also dirt cheap and can easily be found.
:behind:Matt94GT said:5.0 is cheap, and easy to modify. the 4.6 can be a better/faster motor if you want to sink in lots of money. parts for 5.0 are also dirt cheap and can easily be found.
Z28 This said::behind:Matt94GT said:5.0 is cheap, and easy to modify. the 4.6 can be a better/faster motor if you want to sink in lots of money. parts for 5.0 are also dirt cheap and can easily be found.
i disagree there 2 different engines and each one has its own down falls...like 5.0 make wayy more tq and better for low end on the 4.6 side more for high end well duh cause there high rev motors...so to me there not better/faster ive busted more than my fair share of 4.6s
Snakebit said:Z28 This said::behind:Matt94GT said:5.0 is cheap, and easy to modify. the 4.6 can be a better/faster motor if you want to sink in lots of money. parts for 5.0 are also dirt cheap and can easily be found.
i disagree there 2 different engines and each one has its own down falls...like 5.0 make wayy more tq and better for low end on the 4.6 side more for high end well duh cause there high rev motors...so to me there not better/faster ive busted more than my fair share of 4.6s
uhhh, check the newer Mach 1 cars before you say the 5.0 makes more tq than the 4.6![]()
GREG@SN95 said:Snakebit said:Z28 This said::behind:Matt94GT said:5.0 is cheap, and easy to modify. the 4.6 can be a better/faster motor if you want to sink in lots of money. parts for 5.0 are also dirt cheap and can easily be found.
i disagree there 2 different engines and each one has its own down falls...like 5.0 make wayy more tq and better for low end on the 4.6 side more for high end well duh cause there high rev motors...so to me there not better/faster ive busted more than my fair share of 4.6s
uhhh, check the newer Mach 1 cars before you say the 5.0 makes more tq than the 4.6![]()
um... check the newer mach 1s... they ain't SN95s :![]()
Snakebit said:GREG@SN95 said:Snakebit said:Z28 This said::behind:Matt94GT said:5.0 is cheap, and easy to modify. the 4.6 can be a better/faster motor if you want to sink in lots of money. parts for 5.0 are also dirt cheap and can easily be found.
i disagree there 2 different engines and each one has its own down falls...like 5.0 make wayy more tq and better for low end on the 4.6 side more for high end well duh cause there high rev motors...so to me there not better/faster ive busted more than my fair share of 4.6s
uhhh, check the newer Mach 1 cars before you say the 5.0 makes more tq than the 4.6![]()
um... check the newer mach 1s... they ain't SN95s :![]()
I was directly contrasting the statement that the 4.6 does not make the tq that the 5.0 does, this has nothing to do with SN95![]()
. Im just stateing facts, the Mach 1 4.6 makes MORE tq than a 5.0 pushrod 302 that came in any form of a factory mustang from 87-95.
96mod289 said:hey guy i found a 94 with a kb on it is this a good deal. he said he want 8.5k http://www.mustangforums.com/m_1785279/mpage_1/key_/tm.htm#1815209
http://www.kbb.com/kb/ki.dll/kw.kc.ucp?kbb.NJ;;NJ029;&08527&;817271&;;ucp;&11;FO;D496mod289 said:ok now my next question is how much do you think i coud get out of my car
it is a '96 GT auto with
highflow mid pipe w/cats
magnaflow magnapacks
BBK 75mm T/B and plenum
JLT RAI
4.10's
it has 56,000 miles on it but the title has a dear hit on it but that is all
96mod289 said:hey guy i found a 94 with a kb on it is this a good deal. he said he want 8.5k http://www.mustangforums.com/m_1785279/mpage_1/key_/tm.htm#1815209