Whoa, I was just playin', guy. Calm down. I'm not a stereotypical narrow-minded mustang owner, at all. For one, I don't own a mustang. Secondly, I didn't realize that mustang owners were so generally narrow-minded that there is a stereotype associated with mustang owners and narronarrow-minded-ness.
I'm not saying that the artwork on the ridiculously riced out charger is not high quality. It's pretty. And pretty is all that counts at car shows, so you are probably right... even if I had a mustang, and even if it was modified how I would modify a mustang, it wouldn't get a second look sitting next to that charger. I don't know what has all been done to that charger in regards to engine/drivetrain/suspension, so I won't comment on anything but the aesthetics. Gullwing doors in the back with butterflies up front make it look like a transformer caught halfway through transforming. Gullwings front and rear would have been cool. Normal doors up front and suicide doors in the rear would have been nice. Butterflies up front and reverse (suicide) butterflies in the back would have been killer. But mixing lambo doors and delorean doors doesn't do it for me. It's my opinion, and like everyone else on the interwebs, I feel entitled to tell everybody what I think. Take it for what it is... An opinion.
I am a die-hard form follows function believer. In my limited experience, I have found that most of the time, when you see flashy paintjobs and lambo doors (not on a Lamborghini), that all the money went to form, not function. I have found exceptions to this. I have seen fully built and tuned, absolutely baller performance machines with flashy paint and suicide doors and even ridiculous rice underglow lights, on legit 10-second cars... forgive my ignorance if that charger happens to an equally impressive powerplant and suspension to go with all that fancy paint.
I appreciate hard work, I just appreciate it more when it's performance oriented, not just skin deep.
