So I finally ran my car

OP
OP
J

justinschmidt1

Post Whore
Joined
Dec 4, 2006
Messages
10,667
Reaction score
428
Boo$t Or Die said:
Im working on the timeslip but they way you handle it and tell everyone I runs 17 full out is a different story. While you know I dont run 17s. Give me some time to get everything worked out before you start saying stuff . Watever im tired of always arguing with you over cars so think before you say something. Ohh and strength dosent have anything to do with knowing how to fight. And it dosent matter who you hang with or where you live. Its over, were grown men arguing over our somewhat slow cars. I dont want to lose a best friend because of two gearheads with the nicest cars in the school competing over who knows more and who has the better car. In a couple of years I bet my life well be doin this in are Arpus mobiles :eek:uttahere: Boostin

Im not even arguing..whos tellin you this shit? Why would I say your car run 17s?..nobody can predict what its will run...just run it and find out..its not even worth arguin about...its not big deal..i still have yet to figure out what your mad about? becuase I said your missing 2 cylinders?...its a joke...its not even serious..
 

quickstang_1994

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2006
Messages
2,208
Reaction score
12
Location
Cross Anchor, SC
justinschmidt1 said:
It ran pretty good for the situation...No pi intake yet, wasnt using my brothers superchip tuner( which makes a world of a differance for the auto), and horrible bald futura pep boys tires...but anyways got a few runs in...traction was kind of a issue becuase it was real cold

So heres about how it went...

Run 1
60 2.27
330 6.249
1/8 9.498
mph 75.65
1000 12.30
1/4 14.675
mph 95.15
was decent but a 2.3 60 is not what I was shooting for...

run 2 tryed lowering the tire pressure..had no gauge..but then found out I only lowered them to 35psi with my friends gauge..but it seemed to help a little
60 2.25
330 6.222
1/8 9.45
mph 76.07
1000 12.24
1/4 14.5
mph 96.22

So not too bad for an auto non pi gt I thought...hopefully with tires, xcal2, and pi intake I will see some low 14s.

I ran almost the exact time in my stock S281 Speedster. I was wondering if anyone else with an auto had those times Iwas begining to think some changed out my motor with a PI.
 
OP
OP
J

justinschmidt1

Post Whore
Joined
Dec 4, 2006
Messages
10,667
Reaction score
428
quickstang_1994 said:
justinschmidt1 said:
It ran pretty good for the situation...No pi intake yet, wasnt using my brothers superchip tuner( which makes a world of a differance for the auto), and horrible bald futura pep boys tires...but anyways got a few runs in...traction was kind of a issue becuase it was real cold

So heres about how it went...

Run 1
60 2.27
330 6.249
1/8 9.498
mph 75.65
1000 12.30
1/4 14.675
mph 95.15
was decent but a 2.3 60 is not what I was shooting for...

run 2 tryed lowering the tire pressure..had no gauge..but then found out I only lowered them to 35psi with my friends gauge..but it seemed to help a little
60 2.25
330 6.222
1/8 9.45
mph 76.07
1000 12.24
1/4 14.5
mph 96.22

So not too bad for an auto non pi gt I thought...hopefully with tires, xcal2, and pi intake I will see some low 14s.

I ran almost the exact time in my stock S281 Speedster. I was wondering if anyone else with an auto had those times Iwas begining to think some changed out my motor with a PI.

Yea, I dont know if the guy before me did anything....maybe he put a pi cam in or something..who knows..no pi intake though..
 

quickstang_1994

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2006
Messages
2,208
Reaction score
12
Location
Cross Anchor, SC
Most 5 speeds(99+) run 77-79 mph and you ran 76. But the combo may fit good together. Mine does. For now I got a taste of boost in th 94 so driving the Saleen is boring but it get attention.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
77,505
Messages
1,503,937
Members
14,977
Latest member
Vallybell

Members online

Top