What do you think?

Discussion in '94-95 5.0 - Specific' started by rob10s2, May 1, 2007.

  1. rob10s2

    rob10s2 New Member

    Messages:
    78
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2006
  2. Suspect

    Suspect Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,776
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2006
    Location:
    ATL
    seen the article before.. eh i dunno. also those #s would change @ the wheel.

    id like to see what ryclef says about it.
     
  3. ryclef331

    ryclef331 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,913
    Likes Received:
    9
    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2006
    Whats not to believe? Remember that is all power at the motor! 15% loss through the drivetrain puts you at around 320rwhp. VERY obtainable....
     
  4. Suspect

    Suspect Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,776
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2006
    Location:
    ATL
    with a stock cam tho?! :eek:
     
  5. ryclef331

    ryclef331 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,913
    Likes Received:
    9
    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2006
    Ever watch NMRA Real Street? 310cubic inch limit, Mildly ported out of the box heads allowed, and all on a STOCK CAM (or stock cam specs) and ONE power adder. Guys are running in the bottom of the 10s to high 9's....on a stock cam. Granted it allows a power adder but 10s on a stock cam....that takes some power to make it run that good. So i find it VERY easy to believe that they can make that power at the motor on a stock roller cam....
     
  6. rob10s2

    rob10s2 New Member

    Messages:
    78
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2006
    i dont want to go carbed, but i think im gonna try it fuel injected.
    its gonna take a while to save that much tho.
    thanks!