Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Engine Specific Tech
94-95 5.0 - Specific
331 Bottom End
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="snakebit95" data-source="post: 560103" data-attributes="member: 11394"><p>What cam? </p><p></p><p>And there is more to it than just heads cam and intake. Its how the car is set up. </p><p></p><p>So your telling me that if you put a 347 set up with the right heads intake (carb efi what ever) and then did the same to the 351 and put it in the same car that the 351 would be fasteR?</p></blockquote><p></p><p>I am not trying to turn the OP's thread into a 351 versus 347 is faster debate. My point was that a stock stroke Windsor can run just as good or better than a 347 if the right parts are used. Never did I say that the 351 will always win over a 347. The 351 is simply a better platform to build from if you plan to use a stock block to make some serioius power in the future. If you really want to get into the details, any 347 will require an aftermarket crank. What would happen if I used an aftermarket stock stroke Windsor crank that has been cut down to Cleveland size mains and 2.1" rod journals and used crank spacers in the block (seen it done a few times)? Now we have a crank that is as light as or lighter than the 347 crank. You have more stroke and a lighter rotating assembly in a stock stroked Windsor package. Oh yea, the 302 block is bored .030, so we need to do the same for the Windsor. Now we have a 357W versus a 347. To make it easier, the aftermarket companies already offer a block with mains sized to accept this type of crank configuration. Hope this helps in some way.</p><p>[/QUOTE]</p>
[QUOTE="snakebit95, post: 560103, member: 11394"] What cam? And there is more to it than just heads cam and intake. Its how the car is set up. So your telling me that if you put a 347 set up with the right heads intake (carb efi what ever) and then did the same to the 351 and put it in the same car that the 351 would be fasteR? [/quote] I am not trying to turn the OP's thread into a 351 versus 347 is faster debate. My point was that a stock stroke Windsor can run just as good or better than a 347 if the right parts are used. Never did I say that the 351 will always win over a 347. The 351 is simply a better platform to build from if you plan to use a stock block to make some serioius power in the future. If you really want to get into the details, any 347 will require an aftermarket crank. What would happen if I used an aftermarket stock stroke Windsor crank that has been cut down to Cleveland size mains and 2.1" rod journals and used crank spacers in the block (seen it done a few times)? Now we have a crank that is as light as or lighter than the 347 crank. You have more stroke and a lighter rotating assembly in a stock stroked Windsor package. Oh yea, the 302 block is bored .030, so we need to do the same for the Windsor. Now we have a 357W versus a 347. To make it easier, the aftermarket companies already offer a block with mains sized to accept this type of crank configuration. Hope this helps in some way. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Random media
Latest posts
New Member from Virginia
Latest: Daryl
22 minutes ago
New Member Introductions
Post A Pic Of Your Latest Purchase Thread...
Latest: RAU03MACH
Today at 7:35 PM
The Garage
M
1994 mustang key turned nothing happens
Latest: MasterDot
Today at 5:59 PM
94-95 5.0 - Specific
What Did You Do To Your Car Today?
Latest: 07GtS197
Today at 3:56 PM
The Garage
D
TKX shifter position
Latest: dsrtjeeper
Today at 2:54 PM
Drivetrain
Share this page
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Forum statistics
Threads
78,534
Messages
1,535,721
Members
16,186
Latest member
Armand
Members online
cobra2261
ttocs
Forums
Engine Specific Tech
94-95 5.0 - Specific
331 Bottom End
Top