Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Engine Specific Tech
94-95 5.0 - Specific
any 347 guys?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="LAFENATU" data-source="post: 298406" data-attributes="member: 10097"><p>347 without a doubt...10:1 final compression with the heads...</p><p></p><p>Like Kevin said, you'll love it.</p><p></p><p>CHP makes a nice 347 kit. Uses a 5.315 long rod, a 3.400 stroke and a nice forged piston. Not too expensive either</p><p></p><p>AFR 185 heads, Ed Curtis/Jay Allen Custom Cam and a Holley SM2 intake...It's a proven power maker.</p><p></p><p>You'll hear a 331 is better cause it has a taller piston and better rod ratio. The 347 doesn't last as long as a 331 blah blah blah.</p><p></p><p>Rod ratio = eight rods per crankshaft... Rod ratio is nothing but BS and internet neophites trying to sound important. Same with rod angularity, piston compression heights and any other BS some idiot wants to say. Ask how many engines these people actually built. It'll bring out the truth. :coolsmiley:</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="LAFENATU, post: 298406, member: 10097"] 347 without a doubt...10:1 final compression with the heads... Like Kevin said, you'll love it. CHP makes a nice 347 kit. Uses a 5.315 long rod, a 3.400 stroke and a nice forged piston. Not too expensive either AFR 185 heads, Ed Curtis/Jay Allen Custom Cam and a Holley SM2 intake...It's a proven power maker. You'll hear a 331 is better cause it has a taller piston and better rod ratio. The 347 doesn't last as long as a 331 blah blah blah. Rod ratio = eight rods per crankshaft... Rod ratio is nothing but BS and internet neophites trying to sound important. Same with rod angularity, piston compression heights and any other BS some idiot wants to say. Ask how many engines these people actually built. It'll bring out the truth. :coolsmiley: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Random media
Latest posts
M
1994 mustang key turned nothing happens
Latest: MasterDot
Today at 12:31 AM
94-95 5.0 - Specific
Post A Pic Of Your Latest Purchase Thread...
Latest: RAU03MACH
Today at 12:11 AM
The Garage
What Did You Do To Your Car Today?
Latest: Daryl
Yesterday at 9:22 PM
The Garage
New Member from Virginia
Latest: Daryl
Yesterday at 8:55 PM
New Member Introductions
D
TKX shifter position
Latest: dsrtjeeper
Yesterday at 2:54 PM
Drivetrain
Share this page
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Forum statistics
Threads
78,534
Messages
1,535,730
Members
16,186
Latest member
Armand
Members online
No members online now.
Forums
Engine Specific Tech
94-95 5.0 - Specific
any 347 guys?
Top