Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
TECH
General Tech
Basic questions '94 GT
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Michael Plummer" data-source="post: 1543161" data-attributes="member: 9170"><p>Engine mounts: While polyurethane engine mounts can provide performance benefits for certain applications, they may not be suitable for every vehicle or driver preference due to the potential downsides outlined above. Considering these factors and weighing them against the desired benefits before deciding to upgrade to polyurethane engine mounts is important.</p><p>Polyurethane engine mounts have advantages, such as improved durability, reduced engine movement, and potentially better performance than stock rubber mounts. However, there are also some downsides to using polyurethane engine mounts:</p><p></p><p>1. Increased vibration and noise: Polyurethane is a stiffer material than rubber, which can transmit more engine vibrations and noise into the vehicle's cabin. This can lead to a harsher and louder driving experience, which may not be desirable for some drivers.</p><p></p><p>2. Harder ride quality: The increased stiffness of polyurethane mounts can also result in a firmer ride quality. This can make the vehicle feel more rigid and less comfortable over rough roads or bumps, potentially compromising overall ride comfort.</p><p></p><p>3. Potential for increased wear on other components: The stiffer nature of polyurethane mounts can transfer more vibration and impact forces to other vehicle components, such as the exhaust system or drivetrain. This increased stress may lead to premature wear and potential failures in these components over time.</p><p></p><p>4. Installation challenges: Installing polyurethane engine mounts can sometimes be more difficult than installing stock rubber mounts due to their increased stiffness. Proper alignment and torque specifications must be followed to ensure the mounts are installed correctly and function as intended.</p><p></p><p>5. Cost: Polyurethane engine mounts are typically more expensive than stock rubber mounts, which can deter some vehicle owners, especially if they do not prioritize the performance benefits.</p><p></p><p>IMHO, on your setup, a stock OEM rubber engine mount would be best.</p><p></p><p>I hope that helps</p><p>Michael Plummer</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Michael Plummer, post: 1543161, member: 9170"] Engine mounts: While polyurethane engine mounts can provide performance benefits for certain applications, they may not be suitable for every vehicle or driver preference due to the potential downsides outlined above. Considering these factors and weighing them against the desired benefits before deciding to upgrade to polyurethane engine mounts is important. Polyurethane engine mounts have advantages, such as improved durability, reduced engine movement, and potentially better performance than stock rubber mounts. However, there are also some downsides to using polyurethane engine mounts: 1. Increased vibration and noise: Polyurethane is a stiffer material than rubber, which can transmit more engine vibrations and noise into the vehicle's cabin. This can lead to a harsher and louder driving experience, which may not be desirable for some drivers. 2. Harder ride quality: The increased stiffness of polyurethane mounts can also result in a firmer ride quality. This can make the vehicle feel more rigid and less comfortable over rough roads or bumps, potentially compromising overall ride comfort. 3. Potential for increased wear on other components: The stiffer nature of polyurethane mounts can transfer more vibration and impact forces to other vehicle components, such as the exhaust system or drivetrain. This increased stress may lead to premature wear and potential failures in these components over time. 4. Installation challenges: Installing polyurethane engine mounts can sometimes be more difficult than installing stock rubber mounts due to their increased stiffness. Proper alignment and torque specifications must be followed to ensure the mounts are installed correctly and function as intended. 5. Cost: Polyurethane engine mounts are typically more expensive than stock rubber mounts, which can deter some vehicle owners, especially if they do not prioritize the performance benefits. IMHO, on your setup, a stock OEM rubber engine mount would be best. I hope that helps Michael Plummer [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Random media
Latest posts
What Did You Do To Your Car Today?
Latest: 07GtS197
28 minutes ago
The Garage
D
TKX shifter position
Latest: dsrtjeeper
Today at 2:54 PM
Drivetrain
1994 mustang key turned nothing happens
Latest: ttocs
Today at 1:40 PM
94-95 5.0 - Specific
EFI to Carb conversion- Mods Sticky please
Latest: shovel
Today at 12:15 PM
94-95 5.0 - Specific
You can fit a carb or TBI under the stock SN95 hood.
Latest: shovel
Today at 12:06 PM
94-95 5.0 - Specific
Share this page
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Forum statistics
Threads
78,534
Messages
1,535,717
Members
16,186
Latest member
Armand
Members online
chasingomas
shovel
Forums
TECH
General Tech
Basic questions '94 GT
Top