Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Engine Specific Tech
94-95 5.0 - Specific
Couple second delay in deceleration; a common problem???
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="shovel" data-source="post: 1539959" data-attributes="member: 29855"><p>I'm guessing that's like the high idle thing that a lot of people struggle with when trying to work with a stock ECU and a 30 year old Mustang with various minor mods. </p><p></p><p>My opinion is it's just not worth trying to work with the stock ECU anymore, we used to not have a choice and then later with stuff like the quarterhorse (RIP) it was nice to have some more control. </p><p>But now the low hanging fruit is just go to speed density on a ms3 with widebands.. that modernizes engine control and as far as I can tell those little quirks vanish. It's a bit more money up front but I think in the long run it's a whole lot lower cost. </p><p></p><p>Obviously that only works on cars/locations where emissions testing permits it.. in your case with a 69 Datsun that's not likely a concern.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="shovel, post: 1539959, member: 29855"] I'm guessing that's like the high idle thing that a lot of people struggle with when trying to work with a stock ECU and a 30 year old Mustang with various minor mods. My opinion is it's just not worth trying to work with the stock ECU anymore, we used to not have a choice and then later with stuff like the quarterhorse (RIP) it was nice to have some more control. But now the low hanging fruit is just go to speed density on a ms3 with widebands.. that modernizes engine control and as far as I can tell those little quirks vanish. It's a bit more money up front but I think in the long run it's a whole lot lower cost. Obviously that only works on cars/locations where emissions testing permits it.. in your case with a 69 Datsun that's not likely a concern. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Random media
Latest posts
What Did You Do To Your Car Today?
Latest: Musturd
2 minutes ago
The Garage
2004 gt. Friend noticed K&N air filter..And underneith 2 long flex braces?..
Latest: ttocs
Today at 2:14 AM
General Tech
1995 crank but no start situation
Latest: RAU03MACH
Yesterday at 7:31 PM
94-95 5.0 - Specific
M
Driveshaft and Ring&Pinion recommendation
Latest: Mustang5L5
Yesterday at 7:11 PM
Drivetrain
Lowering spring issue
Latest: 95Five0
Yesterday at 6:39 PM
94-95 5.0 - Specific
Share this page
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Forum statistics
Threads
78,533
Messages
1,535,704
Members
16,186
Latest member
Armand
Members online
Musturd
Forums
Engine Specific Tech
94-95 5.0 - Specific
Couple second delay in deceleration; a common problem???
Top