Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Engine Specific Tech
94-95 5.0 - Specific
FOX Intake Mani Swap! OPs.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Paul" data-source="post: 1105602" data-attributes="member: 9404"><p>Despite what your "calibrated butt" tells you, there is no empirical data to support your claims. Using your example of slapping a single plane manifold on a stock or near-stock 289/302, I guarantee that you lost power AND torque, and made the car slower.</p><p></p><p>To answer your question about "why people care about low-end torque" - it's because of math. Horsepower, oversimplified, is calculated as torque/time. The faster you can make torque, the more horsepower you make.</p><p></p><p>Regarding the Cartech, I've seen many dyno tests over the years (since I started following this stuff, probably around the year 1999/2000) that prove empirically, with actual testing and dyno data, that the long-runner manifolds significantly outperform box and short-runner manifolds in stock and mildly modified combinations.</p><p></p><p>Sorry, but on this topic, you're just wrong.</p><p></p><p>Paul.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Paul, post: 1105602, member: 9404"] Despite what your "calibrated butt" tells you, there is no empirical data to support your claims. Using your example of slapping a single plane manifold on a stock or near-stock 289/302, I guarantee that you lost power AND torque, and made the car slower. To answer your question about "why people care about low-end torque" - it's because of math. Horsepower, oversimplified, is calculated as torque/time. The faster you can make torque, the more horsepower you make. Regarding the Cartech, I've seen many dyno tests over the years (since I started following this stuff, probably around the year 1999/2000) that prove empirically, with actual testing and dyno data, that the long-runner manifolds significantly outperform box and short-runner manifolds in stock and mildly modified combinations. Sorry, but on this topic, you're just wrong. Paul. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Random media
Latest posts
96blak54 2001 Cobra
Latest: white95
Today at 12:22 AM
Build Ups & Projects
Hci or vortech or any other ideas
Latest: ttocs
Today at 12:17 AM
94-95 5.0 - Specific
C
"BlackJack, Nat Loves Dream", my 1999 GT
Latest: chasingomas
Yesterday at 11:38 PM
Build Ups & Projects
New Member 2002 Roush 2 from West Texas
Latest: SsgDoc94
Yesterday at 7:44 PM
New Member Introductions
2001 Cobra clutch recommendation?
Latest: 96blak54
Yesterday at 5:39 PM
96-04 - 4V Specific
Share this page
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Forum statistics
Threads
78,554
Messages
1,536,108
Members
16,198
Latest member
Jerry santos
Members online
No members online now.
Forums
Engine Specific Tech
94-95 5.0 - Specific
FOX Intake Mani Swap! OPs.
Top