Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Multimedia & Entertainment
The Garage
GM: no more Camaro’s as of 2024
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MyLittlePony" data-source="post: 1534654" data-attributes="member: 11359"><p>You put that in your mustang? You know ethanol burns faster, thus poorer fuel economy right? I have a 1967 Triumph GT6 that I buy 91 ethanol free octane for. I’ve put ethanol gas in it, but don’t like doing so on account of how bad is destroyed my fuel pump gaskets. I essentially had to get a modern electric pump, because the manual glass bowl kind kept leaking, and you could actually see the fuel turn from yellow to grey on account of the gaskets dissolving and turning into mush.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Wanna come out to DFW and look at my car? </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Good god that’s ugly!!! I’m kinda glad we didn’t get that. I almost wanna say that’s fake. It’s really not that hard to build an electric mustang. I just don’t understand why they won’t do it. And if the Mach E isn’t a mustang, that sure as hell isn’t either.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Single… …modified extended tank? I’ve never had a a single vehicle that could ever do that. Maybe my mothers 1986 conversion van, but only because it had two tanks, and the fuel back then didn’t have that quick burning ethanol in it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MyLittlePony, post: 1534654, member: 11359"] You put that in your mustang? You know ethanol burns faster, thus poorer fuel economy right? I have a 1967 Triumph GT6 that I buy 91 ethanol free octane for. I’ve put ethanol gas in it, but don’t like doing so on account of how bad is destroyed my fuel pump gaskets. I essentially had to get a modern electric pump, because the manual glass bowl kind kept leaking, and you could actually see the fuel turn from yellow to grey on account of the gaskets dissolving and turning into mush. Wanna come out to DFW and look at my car? Good god that’s ugly!!! I’m kinda glad we didn’t get that. I almost wanna say that’s fake. It’s really not that hard to build an electric mustang. I just don’t understand why they won’t do it. And if the Mach E isn’t a mustang, that sure as hell isn’t either. Single… …modified extended tank? I’ve never had a a single vehicle that could ever do that. Maybe my mothers 1986 conversion van, but only because it had two tanks, and the fuel back then didn’t have that quick burning ethanol in it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Random media
Latest posts
Hci or vortech or any other ideas
Latest: 95Five0
22 minutes ago
94-95 5.0 - Specific
Wheel and tire specs?
Latest: SsgDoc94
23 minutes ago
Suspension and Brakes
Complete sn95 5.0 OEM exhaust system for sale in davenport iowa.
Latest: shovel
Today at 12:50 PM
94-95 5.0 - Specific
What Did You Do To Your Car Today?
Latest: NEW EDG
Today at 11:10 AM
The Garage
"BlackJack, Nat Loves Dream", my 1999 GT
Latest: 07GtS197
Today at 7:05 AM
Build Ups & Projects
Share this page
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Forum statistics
Threads
78,554
Messages
1,536,116
Members
16,201
Latest member
jgib8795
Members online
shovel
Forums
Multimedia & Entertainment
The Garage
GM: no more Camaro’s as of 2024
Top