Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="notfasteA..nuf" data-source="post: 396235" data-attributes="member: 8805">You know why... they're cheap relatively.I mean come on - look at production numbers of the older in the SN95 gen.'94 - 123k (5k were Cobras)'95 - 165k (4k were Cobras)That's a ton of GTs and V6s which can be had for < 8k. Just think about the history of the chassis and how many Mustangs are on the road now. These cars mentioned above are 13-14 years old now, they're cheap, they look good (not outdated) and they still run decent. What does money have to do with it? Simple - they are either project cars (like mine) or a car you can put extra money towards mods because you bought a cheaper vehicle (ie, they like adding "all show" mods). With these high production numbers you get a huge cross section of car enthusiasts, which is a cool thing IMO. Not trying to compare, but look around - do you really see as many F-Bodies cruising around as Mustangs? I guess I'm still confused by the import statement and what was referred to.I will however go out on a limb and say that there are probably more ricer-type Mustangs here than other forums I'm on - understandable considering this board is dedicated to this gen and not just Mustangs in general - like I said, larger cross section.</blockquote>