Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Multimedia & Entertainment
The Garage
My 70 dollar Heat Extractor Hood
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="massacre" data-source="post: 903260" data-attributes="member: 11752"><p>O RLY?</p><p>Do you really believe this ^^^^ nonsense?</p><p></p><p>This statement and a couple others did it for me.</p><p></p><p>You guys just aren't fucking getting it.</p><p></p><p>Cowl induction was invented for carburetor use.</p><p></p><p>It was made to suck air in at the base of the windshield AT HIGH SPEEDS to force air back into the engine bay through the scoop to feed the carbs.</p><p></p><p>Why then does everyone not understand that the same design sucks air back into the engine bay AT HIGH SPEEDS on a fuel injected car, when it is not needed?</p><p></p><p>Modern cowl hoods are designed to clear tall intakes, blowers, etc. Other than clearance for performance parts(or looks for the ricer crowd), the modern cowl hood isn't even designed to do the same thing as the original cowl-induction design.</p><p></p><p>For NON HIGH-SPEED use, there's nothing wrong with a little rear vent in the hood of an N/A car.</p><p></p><p>But, by removing the heat from the source of a boosted car before it even gets to the motor, after passing through all of the different fluid/air coolers in the front of the car, it is more efficient and the rear vents aren't so necessary....at least that is the theory.........</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="massacre, post: 903260, member: 11752"] O RLY? Do you really believe this ^^^^ nonsense? This statement and a couple others did it for me. You guys just aren't fucking getting it. Cowl induction was invented for carburetor use. It was made to suck air in at the base of the windshield AT HIGH SPEEDS to force air back into the engine bay through the scoop to feed the carbs. Why then does everyone not understand that the same design sucks air back into the engine bay AT HIGH SPEEDS on a fuel injected car, when it is not needed? Modern cowl hoods are designed to clear tall intakes, blowers, etc. Other than clearance for performance parts(or looks for the ricer crowd), the modern cowl hood isn't even designed to do the same thing as the original cowl-induction design. For NON HIGH-SPEED use, there's nothing wrong with a little rear vent in the hood of an N/A car. But, by removing the heat from the source of a boosted car before it even gets to the motor, after passing through all of the different fluid/air coolers in the front of the car, it is more efficient and the rear vents aren't so necessary....at least that is the theory......... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Random media
Latest posts
Complete sn95 5.0 OEM exhaust system for sale in davenport iowa.
Latest: shovel
Today at 12:50 PM
94-95 5.0 - Specific
Hci or vortech or any other ideas
Latest: shovel
Today at 12:20 PM
94-95 5.0 - Specific
What Did You Do To Your Car Today?
Latest: NEW EDG
Today at 11:10 AM
The Garage
"BlackJack, Nat Loves Dream", my 1999 GT
Latest: 07GtS197
Today at 7:05 AM
Build Ups & Projects
96blak54 2001 Cobra
Latest: white95
Today at 12:22 AM
Build Ups & Projects
Share this page
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Forum statistics
Threads
78,554
Messages
1,536,114
Members
16,201
Latest member
jgib8795
Members online
Musturd
ju015dd
Forums
Multimedia & Entertainment
The Garage
My 70 dollar Heat Extractor Hood
Top