Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
TECH
Suspension and Brakes
Panhard bar and LCAs or Cobra IRS?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ReplicaR" data-source="post: 779696" data-attributes="member: 9209"><p>I'm sure that there are quite a few racers who will disagree with you on that one. There are tons of cars out there, which are fast as hell, have tons of rear traction, and are running a 3 link. When the tracks are smooth enough, which most of them are, solid axle hooks up really well. There are some things that I'm not big on, after the torque arm install, but most of those come from daily driver perspective.</p><p></p><p>There are some really good advantages to having IRS, such as fixed differential location. This means that pinion angle will stay the same no matter what, unlike torque arm for example, and no matter how much you lower it, you will never rub drive shaft on the e-brake bracket.</p><p></p><p>My thought is that converting car from one setup to another is kinda pointless, because they work about the same on the road course. If your car came with IRS, then you can keep it and make it work. But if you have solid axle, it will be cheaper for you to make that work, especially seeing how well a good 3 link setup will work on the track. To swap IRS into Mustang, then get all the mods on there to make it run right, will cost probably twice as much as a good 3 link setup with centering device.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ReplicaR, post: 779696, member: 9209"] I'm sure that there are quite a few racers who will disagree with you on that one. There are tons of cars out there, which are fast as hell, have tons of rear traction, and are running a 3 link. When the tracks are smooth enough, which most of them are, solid axle hooks up really well. There are some things that I'm not big on, after the torque arm install, but most of those come from daily driver perspective. There are some really good advantages to having IRS, such as fixed differential location. This means that pinion angle will stay the same no matter what, unlike torque arm for example, and no matter how much you lower it, you will never rub drive shaft on the e-brake bracket. My thought is that converting car from one setup to another is kinda pointless, because they work about the same on the road course. If your car came with IRS, then you can keep it and make it work. But if you have solid axle, it will be cheaper for you to make that work, especially seeing how well a good 3 link setup will work on the track. To swap IRS into Mustang, then get all the mods on there to make it run right, will cost probably twice as much as a good 3 link setup with centering device. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Random media
Latest posts
Hci or vortech or any other ideas
Latest: GTamas
A moment ago
94-95 5.0 - Specific
What Did You Do To Your Car Today?
Latest: shovel
37 minutes ago
The Garage
Nice clean phone mount & USB
Latest: shovel
53 minutes ago
Exterior and Interior
Canary Yellow 94 GT Automatic bone stock
Latest: RossA81
57 minutes ago
Build Ups & Projects
1995 crank but no start situation
Latest: 95opal
Today at 1:54 PM
94-95 5.0 - Specific
Share this page
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Forum statistics
Threads
78,557
Messages
1,536,171
Members
16,201
Latest member
jgib8795
Members online
GTamas
weendoggy
Forums
TECH
Suspension and Brakes
Panhard bar and LCAs or Cobra IRS?
Top