Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Engine Specific Tech
94-95 5.0 - Specific
Question about Cam LSA
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="itsell" data-source="post: 1493806" data-attributes="member: 29011"><p>The Steeda #19 is one I’m strongly considering for sure. With 1.72 rockers it will be at .516/.516 lift. A nice place to be I think with the spring pressure I’ll likely use to keep my pedestal rockers reliable. The duration on that cam is high though 280/286 advertised, 220/<a href="mailto:226@0.50">226@0.50</a>. I do wonder how my piston to valve clearance will be as I’m using stock pistons . Also I wonder what effect 1.72 rockers will have on how that cam behaves, quite a few people say it’s a little soft below 3k rpm when used naturally aspirated. It was also designed for use with 1.6 rockers I believe, but I’m unsure what makes a cam designed for one rocker ratio to begin with. That was kind of my initial question.</p><p></p><p>The Crower 15511 is also high on my list 278/282 advertised, 218/224@.050, .503/.522 with 1.72 114LSA</p><p>Seems similar to the Steeda #19, but perhaps less soft down low.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="itsell, post: 1493806, member: 29011"] The Steeda #19 is one I’m strongly considering for sure. With 1.72 rockers it will be at .516/.516 lift. A nice place to be I think with the spring pressure I’ll likely use to keep my pedestal rockers reliable. The duration on that cam is high though 280/286 advertised, 220/[EMAIL]226@0.50[/EMAIL]. I do wonder how my piston to valve clearance will be as I’m using stock pistons . Also I wonder what effect 1.72 rockers will have on how that cam behaves, quite a few people say it’s a little soft below 3k rpm when used naturally aspirated. It was also designed for use with 1.6 rockers I believe, but I’m unsure what makes a cam designed for one rocker ratio to begin with. That was kind of my initial question. The Crower 15511 is also high on my list 278/282 advertised, 218/224@.050, .503/.522 with 1.72 114LSA Seems similar to the Steeda #19, but perhaps less soft down low. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Random media
Latest posts
New guy from WA state
Latest: Ronnied
Today at 12:28 PM
New Member Introductions
What Did You Do To Your Car Today?
Latest: wmfateam
Today at 11:49 AM
The Garage
M
What lb radiator cap 347 sbf
Latest: Mustang5L5
Today at 10:32 AM
94-95 5.0 - Specific
M
Big 4 piston caliper, "genisis brembo, 13in brake upgrade adventure
Latest: Mustang5L5
Today at 10:28 AM
Suspension and Brakes
I
Wayne's Tropic Green New Edge GT
Latest: ironhorsewayne
Today at 9:03 AM
Build Ups & Projects
Share this page
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Forum statistics
Threads
78,541
Messages
1,535,879
Members
16,190
Latest member
96GTPlanB
Members online
ju015dd
shovel
ttocs
Forums
Engine Specific Tech
94-95 5.0 - Specific
Question about Cam LSA
Top