Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Multimedia & Entertainment
Members Rides
Road Course SN95
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="LilRoush" data-source="post: 916102" data-attributes="member: 14887"><p>Most I've dyno'd stock were in the 155-165 rwhp range, so I was using that as a base line. </p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p>I've been there - white car and all. I started off thinking a lower center of gravity would help more than keeping the geometry right (keeping the A arms in a position to make best use of the strut and steering arm). I ran it like that and had been lap times then stock. After a few classes and seat time, I found out for myself lower isn't always better. I raised it up (was running Ground Pounder coilovers with Bilsteins) and I cut seconds off my lap times with no other changes. Just something to think about. </p><p></p><p>I also got rid of my long tubes. They added power up high in the RPM range, but the place my car suffered was down low on the track. I could corner with the best of them, but it sucked getting speed after coming out of the corner. I redid the exhaust using stock manifolds, catted H pipe and Spin Tech side exit mufflers. It made peak tq alot lower in the RPM range. Peak HP is good for dyno sheets and forum signatures, but usable power is all that matters on the road courses. </p><p></p><p>I get what you mean now about the springs. Makes sense. What rate are you thinking of? </p><p></p><p>In the end I went with this:</p><p>Up front - tubular K member, fox body tubular A arms, '01 Roush Stage 3 springs (cut one coil), fox body Bilstein HD, Roush sway bar, 13" front rotors (Baer), Roush calipers, SS lines, Hawk HP pads, Flaming River rack and pinion, Steeda x2 ball joints.</p><p>Out back - Roush tubular lower control arms, stock uppers, '01 RS3 springs, fox body Bilstein HD, 13" rotors (Baer), Hawk HP pads, stock GT sway bar.</p><p></p><p>I ran strut tower and shock tower braces from Kenny Brown for awhile, but got rid of both when I supercharged the car. Didn't see a loss afterwards. </p><p></p><p>Are you thinking of a different wheel/tire combo for track use? I ran 18x9/18x10 combo for awhile, but switched to a set of 17x8 running 275/40 R compound all around and could carry more speed into the corners.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="LilRoush, post: 916102, member: 14887"] Most I've dyno'd stock were in the 155-165 rwhp range, so I was using that as a base line. I've been there - white car and all. I started off thinking a lower center of gravity would help more than keeping the geometry right (keeping the A arms in a position to make best use of the strut and steering arm). I ran it like that and had been lap times then stock. After a few classes and seat time, I found out for myself lower isn't always better. I raised it up (was running Ground Pounder coilovers with Bilsteins) and I cut seconds off my lap times with no other changes. Just something to think about. I also got rid of my long tubes. They added power up high in the RPM range, but the place my car suffered was down low on the track. I could corner with the best of them, but it sucked getting speed after coming out of the corner. I redid the exhaust using stock manifolds, catted H pipe and Spin Tech side exit mufflers. It made peak tq alot lower in the RPM range. Peak HP is good for dyno sheets and forum signatures, but usable power is all that matters on the road courses. I get what you mean now about the springs. Makes sense. What rate are you thinking of? In the end I went with this: Up front - tubular K member, fox body tubular A arms, '01 Roush Stage 3 springs (cut one coil), fox body Bilstein HD, Roush sway bar, 13" front rotors (Baer), Roush calipers, SS lines, Hawk HP pads, Flaming River rack and pinion, Steeda x2 ball joints. Out back - Roush tubular lower control arms, stock uppers, '01 RS3 springs, fox body Bilstein HD, 13" rotors (Baer), Hawk HP pads, stock GT sway bar. I ran strut tower and shock tower braces from Kenny Brown for awhile, but got rid of both when I supercharged the car. Didn't see a loss afterwards. Are you thinking of a different wheel/tire combo for track use? I ran 18x9/18x10 combo for awhile, but switched to a set of 17x8 running 275/40 R compound all around and could carry more speed into the corners. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Random media
Latest posts
M
1994 mustang key turned nothing happens
Latest: MasterDot
A moment ago
94-95 5.0 - Specific
What Did You Do To Your Car Today?
Latest: RAU03MACH
Today at 9:08 AM
The Garage
2004 gt. Friend noticed K&N air filter..And underneith 2 long flex braces?..
Latest: ttocs
Today at 2:14 AM
General Tech
1995 crank but no start situation
Latest: RAU03MACH
Yesterday at 7:31 PM
94-95 5.0 - Specific
M
Driveshaft and Ring&Pinion recommendation
Latest: Mustang5L5
Yesterday at 7:11 PM
Drivetrain
Share this page
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Forum statistics
Threads
78,533
Messages
1,535,709
Members
16,186
Latest member
Armand
Members online
MasterDot
ttocs
shovel
Forums
Multimedia & Entertainment
Members Rides
Road Course SN95
Top