Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Engine Specific Tech
94-95 5.0 - Specific
stock rod sizes?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="forkliftfixr" data-source="post: 288151" data-attributes="member: 9834"><p>Well, a "simple" answer is that there is NO difference in them. The weights are almost identical depending on the material used, so there is no major weight savings. However some people will argue differently. The reason most engine builders feel I beams are slightly better is because of an argument that since the H beams have "voids" or open areas in the side of the beam, those areas can have a tendency to act like scoops, allowing oil to pool up inside the voids and throwing it around the crankcase causing horsepower loss due to additional windage. Because the I beams have a flat side on the beam, this is not an issue with that design.. Also, some feel that because the I beam design has slightly more material in the cross section of the beam, they are a slightly stronger design as well, (although the difference is very minimal, if even 5% to 6% from what I have read)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="forkliftfixr, post: 288151, member: 9834"] Well, a "simple" answer is that there is NO difference in them. The weights are almost identical depending on the material used, so there is no major weight savings. However some people will argue differently. The reason most engine builders feel I beams are slightly better is because of an argument that since the H beams have "voids" or open areas in the side of the beam, those areas can have a tendency to act like scoops, allowing oil to pool up inside the voids and throwing it around the crankcase causing horsepower loss due to additional windage. Because the I beams have a flat side on the beam, this is not an issue with that design.. Also, some feel that because the I beam design has slightly more material in the cross section of the beam, they are a slightly stronger design as well, (although the difference is very minimal, if even 5% to 6% from what I have read) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Random media
Latest posts
2004 gt. Friend noticed K&N air filter..And underneith 2 long flex braces?..
Latest: ttocs
Today at 2:14 AM
General Tech
What Did You Do To Your Car Today?
Latest: shovel
Today at 1:05 AM
The Garage
1995 crank but no start situation
Latest: RAU03MACH
Yesterday at 7:31 PM
94-95 5.0 - Specific
M
Driveshaft and Ring&Pinion recommendation
Latest: Mustang5L5
Yesterday at 7:11 PM
Drivetrain
Lowering spring issue
Latest: 95Five0
Yesterday at 6:39 PM
94-95 5.0 - Specific
Share this page
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Forum statistics
Threads
78,533
Messages
1,535,704
Members
16,186
Latest member
Armand
Members online
No members online now.
Forums
Engine Specific Tech
94-95 5.0 - Specific
stock rod sizes?
Top