Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
TECH
Forced Induction & Tuning
Supercharger vs Turbo
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Shocker98GT" data-source="post: 172007" data-attributes="member: 9697"><p>Couple of reasons really.</p><p></p><p>1: A Roots blower is the only blower that the class allows, twinscrews aren't allowed nor are turbos.</p><p></p><p>2: Nitromethane releases it's own oxygen when burned. The cars aren't starved as much for air (for the power delivered, I mean) as they are fuel, opposed to a gas motor. Running lean is a huge problem, and they cram so much of the fuel mixture into the cylinders that they are just on the verge of the hydraulic lock, they run a 1.7:1 air/fuel ratio (which is stoichiometric for nitromethane). Running lean=burnt metal, running rich=hydrolocking, the tuning is the most important part of a successful run because nitromethane is so touchy. A roots blower has a predictable boost curve. Turbo? Now that'd be nearly impossible or at least VERY hard to get right just due to the nature of a turbo's boost curve. Consistency and predictability is key. Aside from that, the flame front for burned nitromethane is around 7050 degrees F. Turbo system, even one built of super-exotic materials, wouldn't be reliable AT ALL and would be very lucky to make it through the run, probably through staging realistically. Top Fuel cars have enough issues as-is.</p><p> </p><p>3: The exhaust of a top fuel dragster is actually designed to produce downforce, around 800lbs or so, that's why the pipes are turned upwards. Having one turbo exhaust outlet vs 4 exhaust outlets on each bank would complicate this, aside from the turbo being a huge exhaust restriction in itself especially in this scenario. A car making 8000hp can't afford such an exhaust restriction compared to something like a street motor.</p><p></p><p>4: Turbo plumbing, BOV, turbo itself (it would take a MASSIVE turbo to provide that much oxygen) equals more weight, a big consideration for a car that only weighs ~1200lbs.</p><p></p><p>5: Chassis is only rated to 330mph by the NHRA anyway</p><p></p><p>6: Engine of the cars are broken down after every single pass. The tons of piping used to turbo such as car would obviously severely complicate such a matter.</p><p></p><p>That obviously isn't every reason, but some of the more compelling ones IMO..</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Shocker98GT, post: 172007, member: 9697"] Couple of reasons really. 1: A Roots blower is the only blower that the class allows, twinscrews aren't allowed nor are turbos. 2: Nitromethane releases it's own oxygen when burned. The cars aren't starved as much for air (for the power delivered, I mean) as they are fuel, opposed to a gas motor. Running lean is a huge problem, and they cram so much of the fuel mixture into the cylinders that they are just on the verge of the hydraulic lock, they run a 1.7:1 air/fuel ratio (which is stoichiometric for nitromethane). Running lean=burnt metal, running rich=hydrolocking, the tuning is the most important part of a successful run because nitromethane is so touchy. A roots blower has a predictable boost curve. Turbo? Now that'd be nearly impossible or at least VERY hard to get right just due to the nature of a turbo's boost curve. Consistency and predictability is key. Aside from that, the flame front for burned nitromethane is around 7050 degrees F. Turbo system, even one built of super-exotic materials, wouldn't be reliable AT ALL and would be very lucky to make it through the run, probably through staging realistically. Top Fuel cars have enough issues as-is. 3: The exhaust of a top fuel dragster is actually designed to produce downforce, around 800lbs or so, that's why the pipes are turned upwards. Having one turbo exhaust outlet vs 4 exhaust outlets on each bank would complicate this, aside from the turbo being a huge exhaust restriction in itself especially in this scenario. A car making 8000hp can't afford such an exhaust restriction compared to something like a street motor. 4: Turbo plumbing, BOV, turbo itself (it would take a MASSIVE turbo to provide that much oxygen) equals more weight, a big consideration for a car that only weighs ~1200lbs. 5: Chassis is only rated to 330mph by the NHRA anyway 6: Engine of the cars are broken down after every single pass. The tons of piping used to turbo such as car would obviously severely complicate such a matter. That obviously isn't every reason, but some of the more compelling ones IMO.. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Random media
Latest posts
96blak54 2001 Cobra
Latest: white95
Today at 12:22 AM
Build Ups & Projects
Hci or vortech or any other ideas
Latest: ttocs
Today at 12:17 AM
94-95 5.0 - Specific
C
"BlackJack, Nat Loves Dream", my 1999 GT
Latest: chasingomas
Yesterday at 11:38 PM
Build Ups & Projects
New Member 2002 Roush 2 from West Texas
Latest: SsgDoc94
Yesterday at 7:44 PM
New Member Introductions
2001 Cobra clutch recommendation?
Latest: 96blak54
Yesterday at 5:39 PM
96-04 - 4V Specific
Share this page
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Forum statistics
Threads
78,554
Messages
1,536,108
Members
16,198
Latest member
Jerry santos
Members online
No members online now.
Forums
TECH
Forced Induction & Tuning
Supercharger vs Turbo
Top