Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Engine Specific Tech
96-04 - 2V Specific
Truth about NPI vs PI
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Leo 5.0" data-source="post: 1268878" data-attributes="member: 19276"><p>I know this thread is old, but I want to clarify something. If for nothing else than personal knowledge.</p><p>But in essence, all things considered...</p><p></p><p>Would the PI intake, NPI heads, with some NPI Cams, your typical bolt ons, and longtubes, would be close if not the same to a full PI swap minus the bolt ons and exhaust?</p><p></p><p>My reasoning is this, since the NPIs suffer more on the exhaust side, long tubes would be especially helpful here no?</p><p>And while the PI heads bump compression, if you take that out of the equation, then the numbers should be close no?</p><p>So in theory, PI intake, even regular PI cams, your bolt ons, and full exhaust with a good tune, should be able to net 250-260 range, as opposed to the PI heads and the compression where 270+ seems standard for the exact same mods?</p><p></p><p>Because I had a thought.</p><p>Minus the heads, but adding good NPI cams, shouldn't that balance out for a bit better than stock PI figures, while keeping a lower, more boost friendly CR?</p><p>Granted at the point of cams, you may as well do the headswap, but not everyone will want to do that. </p><p></p><p>Sorry for reviving a dead thread, but it fits the topic and my insomnia is getting to me, so I've been up all night reading, and am curious if I am off ground.</p><p></p><p>But I would think minus the bump for compression, 250-260 would be attainable yes?</p><p>Seeing as many without aftermarket cams with the PI swap and not even long tubes hit around 270, I am basing this off the OP statement, and many other comments saying most of our gain from the heads is the compression bump.</p><p>Not dismissing the PI heads, but keeping on the subject of not using them for whatever reason someone may have.</p><p></p><p>Ok, I asked.</p><p>Again sorry, haha reading all night makes me curious.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Leo 5.0, post: 1268878, member: 19276"] I know this thread is old, but I want to clarify something. If for nothing else than personal knowledge. But in essence, all things considered... Would the PI intake, NPI heads, with some NPI Cams, your typical bolt ons, and longtubes, would be close if not the same to a full PI swap minus the bolt ons and exhaust? My reasoning is this, since the NPIs suffer more on the exhaust side, long tubes would be especially helpful here no? And while the PI heads bump compression, if you take that out of the equation, then the numbers should be close no? So in theory, PI intake, even regular PI cams, your bolt ons, and full exhaust with a good tune, should be able to net 250-260 range, as opposed to the PI heads and the compression where 270+ seems standard for the exact same mods? Because I had a thought. Minus the heads, but adding good NPI cams, shouldn't that balance out for a bit better than stock PI figures, while keeping a lower, more boost friendly CR? Granted at the point of cams, you may as well do the headswap, but not everyone will want to do that. Sorry for reviving a dead thread, but it fits the topic and my insomnia is getting to me, so I've been up all night reading, and am curious if I am off ground. But I would think minus the bump for compression, 250-260 would be attainable yes? Seeing as many without aftermarket cams with the PI swap and not even long tubes hit around 270, I am basing this off the OP statement, and many other comments saying most of our gain from the heads is the compression bump. Not dismissing the PI heads, but keeping on the subject of not using them for whatever reason someone may have. Ok, I asked. Again sorry, haha reading all night makes me curious. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Random media
Latest posts
What Did You Do To Your Car Today?
Latest: NEW EDG
Today at 8:48 PM
The Garage
cup/drink holder upgrade ideas?..
Latest: Slice
Today at 8:34 PM
Exterior and Interior
A
1995 crank but no start situation
Latest: Armand
Today at 8:32 PM
94-95 5.0 - Specific
V6/GT rear spoiler 94/95?
Latest: Slice
Today at 8:30 PM
Exterior and Interior
Leaky oil temp sending unit
Latest: Daryl
Today at 7:12 PM
94-95 5.0 - Specific
Share this page
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Forum statistics
Threads
78,555
Messages
1,536,137
Members
16,201
Latest member
jgib8795
Members online
No members online now.
Forums
Engine Specific Tech
96-04 - 2V Specific
Truth about NPI vs PI
Top