Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Engine Specific Tech
96-04 - 2V Specific
Truth about NPI vs PI
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Boomer!" data-source="post: 164346" data-attributes="member: 9720"><p>Wow, I have read this entire thread thinking when is the real point going to come out. Everyone assumes the larger runner of the P.I will make more power, truth be told the P.I actually have a huge flaw which is why they do not make more than the average of 10 rwhp when bolted on to a NPI block. </p><p></p><p>1. Throw away the numbers in CFM, they are a gimmick to sell you something and are only the basics of airflow dynamics.</p><p>2. The shortside radius on the P.I head intake runner is horrible and is a restriction </p><p>3. Yes, the P.I heads flow higher rates of cfm. The airflow reaches it's chokepoint faster as the higher lift numbers approachon the P.I head. I saw a flow chart posted earlier in this thread that shows this happening.</p><p></p><p> "If" and I say if, the P.I head design was so great why did they not opt. for its runners on the SVO heads ? The SVO heads flow ported better than some of the 4 valve heads do. Out of the box they outflow most any port 2 valve head.</p><p></p><p> Believe what you wish, if you want to take CFM as your only data when puchasing a head let you be the one to get burned.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Boomer!, post: 164346, member: 9720"] Wow, I have read this entire thread thinking when is the real point going to come out. Everyone assumes the larger runner of the P.I will make more power, truth be told the P.I actually have a huge flaw which is why they do not make more than the average of 10 rwhp when bolted on to a NPI block. 1. Throw away the numbers in CFM, they are a gimmick to sell you something and are only the basics of airflow dynamics. 2. The shortside radius on the P.I head intake runner is horrible and is a restriction 3. Yes, the P.I heads flow higher rates of cfm. The airflow reaches it's chokepoint faster as the higher lift numbers approachon the P.I head. I saw a flow chart posted earlier in this thread that shows this happening. "If" and I say if, the P.I head design was so great why did they not opt. for its runners on the SVO heads ? The SVO heads flow ported better than some of the 4 valve heads do. Out of the box they outflow most any port 2 valve head. Believe what you wish, if you want to take CFM as your only data when puchasing a head let you be the one to get burned. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Random media
Latest posts
C
"BlackJack, Nat Loves Dream", my 1999 GT
Latest: chasingomas
Today at 1:05 AM
Build Ups & Projects
What Did You Do To Your Car Today?
Latest: NEW EDG
Yesterday at 8:48 PM
The Garage
cup/drink holder upgrade ideas?..
Latest: Slice
Yesterday at 8:34 PM
Exterior and Interior
A
1995 crank but no start situation
Latest: Armand
Yesterday at 8:32 PM
94-95 5.0 - Specific
V6/GT rear spoiler 94/95?
Latest: Slice
Yesterday at 8:30 PM
Exterior and Interior
Share this page
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Forum statistics
Threads
78,555
Messages
1,536,138
Members
16,201
Latest member
jgib8795
Members online
Suspect
Forums
Engine Specific Tech
96-04 - 2V Specific
Truth about NPI vs PI
Top