Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
TECH
Forced Induction & Tuning
(Turbo) Crankcase Ventilation is Important (i.e. my experience with an Amazon catch can)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MachSVT" data-source="post: 1561628" data-attributes="member: 31918"><p>Wanted to add...</p><p></p><p>Turbo applications are extremely difficult for proper crankcase evacuation. In the past, I've tried several methods to create a negative pressure.</p><p></p><p>The most ideal setup for negative pressure is to utilize the inducer side of the turbo as a vacuum source, but due to turbochargers are very sensitive to contaminants being introduced into the inducer wheel (throwing them off balance which will wipe out the turbo bearings / seals) that setup is a gamble. You could utilize a oil separator, provided it is 100% effective and you stay on top of periodically checking it to be certain it doesn't overfill. This method will supply vacuum to the crankcase regardless of RPM.</p><p></p><p>The other option is post turbo, is much more safe, but requires use of a PCV (which introduces restriction of vacuum and I've never found a PCV that did not leak boost into the crankcase) and is only good for evacuation when not in boost...which is somewhat pointless IMO.</p><p></p><p>I ended up (again, in the past) having ridiculously huge free vent filters either off my valve cover, or VERY large lines running to a free vented catch can. While this worked, venting from the valve covers is less than ideal, because we are expecting the pressure to vent out the top of the engine, which counteracts the oil trying to return from the turbo / heads.</p><p></p><p>All of that said, if free venting to atmosphere, the best setup is to vent from the engine block, which depending on application can be very difficult. If an older car that is converted to crank trigger ignition, we would utilize the distributor hole and T that into a hose off the valve cover and then into a free vented catch can. While we still could not take advantage of creating negative pressure, this showed the best results.</p><p></p><p>This topic is one great example of why I prefer positive displacement blowers, as rotor packs are much more durable than turbo inducers, therefore, I can run a completely sealed crankcase evacuation setup that is void of a PCV valve.</p><p></p><p>Anyway, hope this helps.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MachSVT, post: 1561628, member: 31918"] Wanted to add... Turbo applications are extremely difficult for proper crankcase evacuation. In the past, I've tried several methods to create a negative pressure. The most ideal setup for negative pressure is to utilize the inducer side of the turbo as a vacuum source, but due to turbochargers are very sensitive to contaminants being introduced into the inducer wheel (throwing them off balance which will wipe out the turbo bearings / seals) that setup is a gamble. You could utilize a oil separator, provided it is 100% effective and you stay on top of periodically checking it to be certain it doesn't overfill. This method will supply vacuum to the crankcase regardless of RPM. The other option is post turbo, is much more safe, but requires use of a PCV (which introduces restriction of vacuum and I've never found a PCV that did not leak boost into the crankcase) and is only good for evacuation when not in boost...which is somewhat pointless IMO. I ended up (again, in the past) having ridiculously huge free vent filters either off my valve cover, or VERY large lines running to a free vented catch can. While this worked, venting from the valve covers is less than ideal, because we are expecting the pressure to vent out the top of the engine, which counteracts the oil trying to return from the turbo / heads. All of that said, if free venting to atmosphere, the best setup is to vent from the engine block, which depending on application can be very difficult. If an older car that is converted to crank trigger ignition, we would utilize the distributor hole and T that into a hose off the valve cover and then into a free vented catch can. While we still could not take advantage of creating negative pressure, this showed the best results. This topic is one great example of why I prefer positive displacement blowers, as rotor packs are much more durable than turbo inducers, therefore, I can run a completely sealed crankcase evacuation setup that is void of a PCV valve. Anyway, hope this helps. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Random media
Latest posts
Bluetooth transmitter- any that power off plugged in?
Latest: 07GtS197
36 minutes ago
Electrical & Stereo
Weird sensor
Latest: 07GtS197
38 minutes ago
General Tech
Valve covers
Latest: 07GtS197
41 minutes ago
Community News
D
Converting a small block 94/95 from MPFI to TBI - in case anyone else wants to go this route
Latest: dsrtjeeper
Today at 1:02 PM
94-95 5.0 - Specific
What Did You Do To Your Car Today?
Latest: shovel
Yesterday at 11:45 PM
The Garage
Share this page
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Forum statistics
Threads
78,609
Messages
1,537,407
Members
16,253
Latest member
STITCHSCREWW
Members online
No members online now.
Forums
TECH
Forced Induction & Tuning
(Turbo) Crankcase Ventilation is Important (i.e. my experience with an Amazon catch can)
Top