Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
TECH
Suspension and Brakes
What setup for most comfortable ride?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="shovel" data-source="post: 1549990" data-attributes="member: 29855"><p>Ride discussions are always a disaster because everyone's butt is calibrated differently - and wildly so. These are sporty cars built on what was already an aging platform 30 years ago and if they made them plush enough for a cadillac driver they'd be too mushy for a competitive racer. The live rear axle is always going to upset the chassis more than independent suspension will. </p><p></p><p>If your car is actually stock and just aged, yeah replacing rubber is a really good start - that means the spring isolators but it also means the bushings in your control arms (for the front arms you'd probably just want to replace the whole arm since that takes care of the ball joint too). People have all sorts of shock absorber preferences, the standard KYB's (the inexpensive ones) are not at all stiff & they're what I have in both of my Mustangs. I don't have a clue about Koni. </p><p></p><p>If there are aftermarket parts on it now it's anybody's guess what those are, but most of the time "performance" means worse ride quality and half the time it means worse actual performance too.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="shovel, post: 1549990, member: 29855"] Ride discussions are always a disaster because everyone's butt is calibrated differently - and wildly so. These are sporty cars built on what was already an aging platform 30 years ago and if they made them plush enough for a cadillac driver they'd be too mushy for a competitive racer. The live rear axle is always going to upset the chassis more than independent suspension will. If your car is actually stock and just aged, yeah replacing rubber is a really good start - that means the spring isolators but it also means the bushings in your control arms (for the front arms you'd probably just want to replace the whole arm since that takes care of the ball joint too). People have all sorts of shock absorber preferences, the standard KYB's (the inexpensive ones) are not at all stiff & they're what I have in both of my Mustangs. I don't have a clue about Koni. If there are aftermarket parts on it now it's anybody's guess what those are, but most of the time "performance" means worse ride quality and half the time it means worse actual performance too. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Random media
Latest posts
M
1994 mustang key turned nothing happens
Latest: MasterDot
38 minutes ago
94-95 5.0 - Specific
Post A Pic Of Your Latest Purchase Thread...
Latest: Daryl
50 minutes ago
The Garage
What Did You Do To Your Car Today?
Latest: Daryl
Yesterday at 9:22 PM
The Garage
New Member from Virginia
Latest: Daryl
Yesterday at 8:55 PM
New Member Introductions
D
TKX shifter position
Latest: dsrtjeeper
Yesterday at 2:54 PM
Drivetrain
Share this page
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Forum statistics
Threads
78,534
Messages
1,535,738
Members
16,186
Latest member
Armand
Members online
shovel
dutch
Forums
TECH
Suspension and Brakes
What setup for most comfortable ride?
Top