rz5.0
Legend
So your saying they don't sit center with the stock k member? I never looked. But they are centered with the upr
Anyone run a UPR k member?
- Thread starter hondarocks61
- Start date
check out my sig
rz5.0
Legend
Damn. I don't think mine sat that way. Been long tho I don't remember
yeah mine definitely needs to go forward a little....looks terrible
OP
OP
hondarocks61
Active Member
Either way, Id rather have the stock location over to far forward. Lol. cutting fenders and bumper to get that to work if it was to far forward would be a PITAAA!
OnyxCobra
Post Whore
you don't have to cut anything if you move your wheels forward, mine are forward 3/4" and they fit perfectly fine even with a 3" drop. The reason some K members move the wheels forward is because the car benefits from it.
Musturd
Post Whore
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2011
- Messages
- 10,506
- Reaction score
- 2,275
Yea you don't have to do anything if they get moved forward
I hate UPR.
That is all.
That is all.
OP
OP
hondarocks61
Active Member
I say this because some k members (qa1) claim to move the wheels 2 inches forward. Not sure if that includes the bump forward from the control arms. I understand I improves handling. These cars are front heavy.
OP
OP
hondarocks61
Active Member
Why?
justinschmidt1
Post Whore
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2006
- Messages
- 10,667
- Reaction score
- 428
I have a UPR k member...works fine for me.
Mine did not move the wheels at all, you can order the stock location or the k member that moves the wheels though.
Most people that run UPR are fine with it...the haters generally have never run UPR products so its best to just ignore them.
With that said, obviously other more expensive K members are probably better quality.
Mine did not move the wheels at all, you can order the stock location or the k member that moves the wheels though.
Most people that run UPR are fine with it...the haters generally have never run UPR products so its best to just ignore them.
With that said, obviously other more expensive K members are probably better quality.
OP
OP
hondarocks61
Active Member
Does this make Chris a hater?
justinschmidt1
Post Whore
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2006
- Messages
- 10,667
- Reaction score
- 428
OP
OP
hondarocks61
Active Member
Busting your balls Chris. 
lol. Yeah, I was only really looking at MM and Griggs after Qa1, And I dont like the +2 inches idea, One inch forward at most is Ideal IMO. I think If I want more traction Ill move the engine back some day. Like I mentioned earlier, Qa1 advertizes a 2 inch bump forward. Don't know if anyone running one can confirm this or not.
lol. Yeah, I was only really looking at MM and Griggs after Qa1, And I dont like the +2 inches idea, One inch forward at most is Ideal IMO. I think If I want more traction Ill move the engine back some day. Like I mentioned earlier, Qa1 advertizes a 2 inch bump forward. Don't know if anyone running one can confirm this or not.
