Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Engine Specific Tech
96-04 - 2V Specific
350 vs 4.6
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BigTang" data-source="post: 472361" data-attributes="member: 10950"><p>lol speaking of cocky bastards....</p><p>my 93 Z28 (LT1)w/ a cold air kit and flowmaster put down 253 at the tires w/ 301 tq w/ nearly 200k miles on it. The car would run 13.9x all day long on bald good year F1 18" tires, mind you this car was rated at 270 fwhp from the factory. I got it up over 300 rwhp w/ full bolt ons.</p><p>My 86 305 TPI car w/ basic mods went 14.30's. </p><p>Either is enough to drop the smack on 90% of the NPI cars out there.</p><p></p><p>To the 1st poster, 350 stock in anything 3rd gen camaro besides an 87+ IROC/z28? the car had work done to it. You can easily crank out 300+rwhp from a stock looking carbed 350.</p><p></p><p>The advantage to the camaro's in stock form is the torque arm suspension, because it sure as hell isn't its good looks or jenny craig like weigh in. lol its going to dead hook most of the time w/ decent tires. add in the extra torque and you'd better hope you can make up the difference in the big end.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BigTang, post: 472361, member: 10950"] lol speaking of cocky bastards.... my 93 Z28 (LT1)w/ a cold air kit and flowmaster put down 253 at the tires w/ 301 tq w/ nearly 200k miles on it. The car would run 13.9x all day long on bald good year F1 18" tires, mind you this car was rated at 270 fwhp from the factory. I got it up over 300 rwhp w/ full bolt ons. My 86 305 TPI car w/ basic mods went 14.30's. Either is enough to drop the smack on 90% of the NPI cars out there. To the 1st poster, 350 stock in anything 3rd gen camaro besides an 87+ IROC/z28? the car had work done to it. You can easily crank out 300+rwhp from a stock looking carbed 350. The advantage to the camaro's in stock form is the torque arm suspension, because it sure as hell isn't its good looks or jenny craig like weigh in. lol its going to dead hook most of the time w/ decent tires. add in the extra torque and you'd better hope you can make up the difference in the big end. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Random media
Latest posts
Post A Pic Of Your Latest Purchase Thread...
Latest: RAU03MACH
Today at 2:42 PM
The Garage
What Did You Do To Your Car Today?
Latest: shovel
Today at 1:48 PM
The Garage
M
1994 mustang key turned nothing happens
Latest: MasterDot
Today at 12:03 PM
94-95 5.0 - Specific
New Member from Virginia
Latest: Daryl
Yesterday at 8:55 PM
New Member Introductions
D
TKX shifter position
Latest: dsrtjeeper
Yesterday at 2:54 PM
Drivetrain
Share this page
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Forum statistics
Threads
78,534
Messages
1,535,741
Members
16,186
Latest member
Armand
Members online
Musturd
Forums
Engine Specific Tech
96-04 - 2V Specific
350 vs 4.6
Top