Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Multimedia & Entertainment
The Garage
4.6 intake manifold?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mr. OAM" data-source="post: 304183" data-attributes="member: 9816"><p>He specifies that the build is for racing. </p><p></p><p><em>"Something that say, a bracket racer or a modular muscle racer would be interested in."</em></p><p></p><p>He doesn't even mention it as a DD, but he did mention you could drive it to the track if you take out timing and don't get on it.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Your use of your car needs to be chosen, or you have to decide how much performance in each area you are willing to give up. How much road manners are you willing to sacrifice for a car that does pretty good on the track but not as good as it could? </p><p></p><p>For the road you need an engine that can fill the cylinders efficiently at low and mid RPM. To do this you need to maintain air flow <em>velocity</em>. This is what gives you torque to pull out into traffic and a good idle with vacuum to run vacuum actuated accessories, if your car uses them. In a high RPM race engine you need to be able to flow a <em>volume</em> of air in a short amount of time in order to fill the cylinders. This requires a larger intake flow, in cross section, to be able to move a greater volume of air in a shorter amount of time. This is where top end power comes from. Low RPM torque is lost as the velocity needed cannot be achieved. The flow path is not efficient at low RPM. </p><p></p><p>Think of it as when you buy a Pepsi from a fast food restaurant. Some places have large diameter straws take forever for you to get a mouthful of pop while you suck all the air out of it. Other straws are narrow and seem to rocket the liquid to the back of your throat, almost choking you. Same thing with your intake manifold and heads, N/A.</p><p></p><p>These are the physics you have to account for when choosing how you are going to build your engine. That's why there is no engine combo for low end torque and high end HP. There are physics that cannot be discounted. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Another choice you may have is getting your intake extrude honed. This will open up the runners and still maintain the geometry of the runners. Just a thought.</p><p></p><p>Steve</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mr. OAM, post: 304183, member: 9816"] He specifies that the build is for racing. [i]"Something that say, a bracket racer or a modular muscle racer would be interested in."[/i] He doesn't even mention it as a DD, but he did mention you could drive it to the track if you take out timing and don't get on it. Your use of your car needs to be chosen, or you have to decide how much performance in each area you are willing to give up. How much road manners are you willing to sacrifice for a car that does pretty good on the track but not as good as it could? For the road you need an engine that can fill the cylinders efficiently at low and mid RPM. To do this you need to maintain air flow [i]velocity[/i]. This is what gives you torque to pull out into traffic and a good idle with vacuum to run vacuum actuated accessories, if your car uses them. In a high RPM race engine you need to be able to flow a [i]volume[/i] of air in a short amount of time in order to fill the cylinders. This requires a larger intake flow, in cross section, to be able to move a greater volume of air in a shorter amount of time. This is where top end power comes from. Low RPM torque is lost as the velocity needed cannot be achieved. The flow path is not efficient at low RPM. Think of it as when you buy a Pepsi from a fast food restaurant. Some places have large diameter straws take forever for you to get a mouthful of pop while you suck all the air out of it. Other straws are narrow and seem to rocket the liquid to the back of your throat, almost choking you. Same thing with your intake manifold and heads, N/A. These are the physics you have to account for when choosing how you are going to build your engine. That's why there is no engine combo for low end torque and high end HP. There are physics that cannot be discounted. Another choice you may have is getting your intake extrude honed. This will open up the runners and still maintain the geometry of the runners. Just a thought. Steve [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Random media
Latest posts
Alternator relocation on a 94/95 5.0 - What's the cleanest and simplest?
Latest: shovel
34 minutes ago
94-95 5.0 - Specific
Post A Pic Of Your Latest Purchase Thread...
Latest: RAU03MACH
Today at 2:42 PM
The Garage
What Did You Do To Your Car Today?
Latest: shovel
Today at 1:48 PM
The Garage
M
1994 mustang key turned nothing happens
Latest: MasterDot
Today at 12:03 PM
94-95 5.0 - Specific
New Member from Virginia
Latest: Daryl
Yesterday at 8:55 PM
New Member Introductions
Share this page
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Forum statistics
Threads
78,534
Messages
1,535,747
Members
16,186
Latest member
Armand
Members online
duh09
Forums
Multimedia & Entertainment
The Garage
4.6 intake manifold?
Top