Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="castine917" data-source="post: 1229514" data-attributes="member: 11473">Depending on your goals the fox lake ported tfs-r that you chose may be perfect.  If you were using a "power elbow"  the choice of which one you wanted would have depended on the style of carburetor like intake you chose. Steve Morris Engines would likely suggest a carb style intake and elbow.  <a href="http://www.stevemorrisengines.com/engines/sbf/1800hp-sbf" target="_blank">http://www.stevemorrisengines.com/engines/sbf/1800hp-sbf</a>Nelson Racing would likely suggest a custom billet intake.   <a href="http://www.nelsonracingengines.com/parts/Ultimate-in-Fuel-Atomization.html" target="_blank">http://www.nelsonracingengines.com/parts/Ultimate-in-Fuel-Atomization.html</a>When Matt Glover built his foxbody 363, afr205, ysi,e85 combo that put down 1014 rwhp he used a systemax.  That would be foxbody TB not needed example.  <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ry3tBCnzgI" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ry3tBCnzgI</a>My neighbor's fox ran 9s with trickflow headed 306, ysi combo used a tfs-r.  <a href="http://www.streetfire.net/video/jims-new-personal-best-run_193941.htm" target="_blank">http://www.streetfire.net/video/jims-new-personal-best-run_193941.htm</a>My 95 SteveMorris 363, AFR205, combo is still being finalized but, tfs-r 75 deemed sufficient with plans of a ysi.  Whether I do foxbody TB conversion or not hasn't been decided for sure yet.  Still may switch to a procharger too.</blockquote>