Yet another retarded comparison, as mentioned it should've been the GT500 vs. ZL1, or the SS vs. the GT. This is like comparing an SS to a V6 Mustang, no shit Sherlock the SS would win.
The losers over on
www.challengertalk.com compare their 392 Hemi cars that cost $50k to the $30k SS and GT and talk about how fast they are, completely oblivious to the fact that they should be comparing the sled R/T, and comparing their 392 to the GT500. I started a shit storm over there when I asked when Chrysler would get it with their 470 hp top of the line $50k Challenger being the best they have to go against 180 hp MORE GT500 and 100+ hp more ZL1, and they suddenly started talking about how great it is to have trunk space and how they don't need any more power lol.
I can somewhat understand comparing everything to the SS since as of right now it's the top model, but all these comparisons are a model off in their comparisons. Should be GT/SS/RT and GT500/ZL1/SRT since those are the equivalent models in the equal price brackets.
Reading that a GT500 smoked an SS is really nothing to brag about when the car costs $20k more. It's like picking on the retarded kid in class and being proud of it.
