Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Multimedia & Entertainment
The Garage
New Boss motor? Vid link
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Shocker98GT" data-source="post: 181142" data-attributes="member: 9697"><p>I don't know why people think the problem is due to the motor being OHC. OHC is the saving grace to these motors. If you designed a 281 cubic inch motor with a 3.55 bore size, and stuck with the 2V pushrod configuration it would mean an enormous power loss, it would be a DOG, substantially worse than our cars.</p><p></p><p>The 3V heads flow very comparably to the LS6 heads, that's measured on a flowbench set up for a 3.55" bore size. The 4V heads do even better. And this is done keeping enough velocity to maintain low end torque on a small displacement engine. Put those type heads on a 4" bore, reshape the chamber, relocate the valves a bit, it'll make more power AND more torque than the LSx and Hemi engines on the market. Bar none. Just look at the gains people are getting from these motors going to just a 3.7" bore size, most are gaining 30-40lb/ft throughout the ENTIRE rpm range with no other changes. 4" bore would be even better. And add enough displacement to take advantage of the potential headflow....it would murder anything GM and Chrysler have on the table right now. And it'd do it with less displacement, as long as the bore stays large.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Shocker98GT, post: 181142, member: 9697"] I don't know why people think the problem is due to the motor being OHC. OHC is the saving grace to these motors. If you designed a 281 cubic inch motor with a 3.55 bore size, and stuck with the 2V pushrod configuration it would mean an enormous power loss, it would be a DOG, substantially worse than our cars. The 3V heads flow very comparably to the LS6 heads, that's measured on a flowbench set up for a 3.55" bore size. The 4V heads do even better. And this is done keeping enough velocity to maintain low end torque on a small displacement engine. Put those type heads on a 4" bore, reshape the chamber, relocate the valves a bit, it'll make more power AND more torque than the LSx and Hemi engines on the market. Bar none. Just look at the gains people are getting from these motors going to just a 3.7" bore size, most are gaining 30-40lb/ft throughout the ENTIRE rpm range with no other changes. 4" bore would be even better. And add enough displacement to take advantage of the potential headflow....it would murder anything GM and Chrysler have on the table right now. And it'd do it with less displacement, as long as the bore stays large. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Random media
Latest posts
Hci or vortech or any other ideas
Latest: 95Five0
49 minutes ago
94-95 5.0 - Specific
96blak54 2001 Cobra
Latest: white95
Today at 12:22 AM
Build Ups & Projects
C
"BlackJack, Nat Loves Dream", my 1999 GT
Latest: chasingomas
Yesterday at 11:38 PM
Build Ups & Projects
New Member 2002 Roush 2 from West Texas
Latest: SsgDoc94
Yesterday at 7:44 PM
New Member Introductions
2001 Cobra clutch recommendation?
Latest: 96blak54
Yesterday at 5:39 PM
96-04 - 4V Specific
Share this page
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Forum statistics
Threads
78,554
Messages
1,536,110
Members
16,198
Latest member
Jerry santos
Members online
PinkieT
GTamas
Forums
Multimedia & Entertainment
The Garage
New Boss motor? Vid link
Top