Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="justinschmidt1" data-source="post: 495910" data-attributes="member: 8889">lol @ your attempt for a comeback.I never claimed to be fast...but im also not running my mouth saying cars are slow like you are.Wow, you actually would drive that multicolored piece of shit on the street?...I feel bad for you.So how much does your honda weigh there smart guy?Stock curb weights for 92 hatches range from like 2100-2300 pounds, even if your anywhere near the stock weight you have a very light car.Face it, youve completely overhauled that car and its still slow.You have a SWAPPED ENGINE AND A TURBO SETUP!.If I swapped an engine into my car and a turbo setup you better believe I would have a car capable of 9 second 1/4 miles.I dont know where you pulled any of that BS out of your ass but my car has the stock 215 hp 4.6 NPI that it rolled off the floor with in 1996 with 118,000 miles on it.The only part of my engine that is not stock in 96 is the Pi intake, which is a stock 99-04 mustang part anyway...so technically my engine is 100% factory ford.So a more accurate thing to say would be your NPI engine with worthless bolt ons + a pi intake and boost ran these times.Your saying im using excuses yet you say the same thing about being on street tires...only differance is your honda wouldnt do any better on slicks anyway cause you would break your axles if you launch hard.The fact is with slicks, slight weight reduction, no sway bar, a little bit of transmission tuning, my daily driven, STOCK engine mustang could run low 12s/ high 11s.And even on street tires, spinning half way down the track my car still ran like .3 faster...12.71> your 12.98.Oh yeah, and it loooks and sounds 1000x better than your hondaFWIW, If I actually had heads/cams like you said I would probably make another 125 hp at the wheels with the same boost.</blockquote>