Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Engine Specific Tech
96-04 - 2V Specific
New Track times!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="nemoxii" data-source="post: 348427" data-attributes="member: 9782"><p>Just for comparisons sake, same day at the same track, running in the lane next to me, a buddy of mine in a camaro with a proven 260 rwhp(exact same dyno I was on) ran a best of 13.6 @ 101. Now way on this earth will a stock PI GT come close to that. So with that said, my numbers are completely on par. Why the differance in your numbers to my numbers? well I have a few theorys there. Talking with people who run this track alot say is a pretty crappy track, and that if I were to run my car under the exact same conditions down at a better track in texas I'd probably pick up a good half a second. So I don't think you guys are wrong, I just think I'm running strong for where I'm at, especially if you compair me to a car with a proven 260 RWhp. A good tune and some tranny work would have easily seen me to 14.5 - 14.8, so take half a sec off that and bam, were where you guys say I 'should' be. Just some thoughts after talking with people here. Thoughts?</p><p></p><p>-Adam</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="nemoxii, post: 348427, member: 9782"] Just for comparisons sake, same day at the same track, running in the lane next to me, a buddy of mine in a camaro with a proven 260 rwhp(exact same dyno I was on) ran a best of 13.6 @ 101. Now way on this earth will a stock PI GT come close to that. So with that said, my numbers are completely on par. Why the differance in your numbers to my numbers? well I have a few theorys there. Talking with people who run this track alot say is a pretty crappy track, and that if I were to run my car under the exact same conditions down at a better track in texas I'd probably pick up a good half a second. So I don't think you guys are wrong, I just think I'm running strong for where I'm at, especially if you compair me to a car with a proven 260 RWhp. A good tune and some tranny work would have easily seen me to 14.5 - 14.8, so take half a sec off that and bam, were where you guys say I 'should' be. Just some thoughts after talking with people here. Thoughts? -Adam [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Random media
Latest posts
Post A Pic Of Your Latest Purchase Thread...
Latest: RAU03MACH
52 minutes ago
The Garage
What Did You Do To Your Car Today?
Latest: shovel
Today at 1:48 PM
The Garage
M
1994 mustang key turned nothing happens
Latest: MasterDot
Today at 12:03 PM
94-95 5.0 - Specific
New Member from Virginia
Latest: Daryl
Yesterday at 8:55 PM
New Member Introductions
D
TKX shifter position
Latest: dsrtjeeper
Yesterday at 2:54 PM
Drivetrain
Share this page
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Forum statistics
Threads
78,534
Messages
1,535,741
Members
16,186
Latest member
Armand
Members online
tmwsccsh
shovel
MasterDot
Forums
Engine Specific Tech
96-04 - 2V Specific
New Track times!
Top