Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Multimedia & Entertainment
Build Ups & Projects
ReplicaR's Mustang build *finally on track again*
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ReplicaR" data-source="post: 1284190" data-attributes="member: 9209"><p>So, I've an interesting discovery the other day. Below are two springs, one from QA1 (silver), the other is a Hypercoil (blue). Both are same length (10 inches), same rate (450lbs) and same inside diameter (2.5 inches). What's different is that QA1 spring has 10 coils, while the HyperCoil has only 7. This tells me that the metal in the QA1 is so much weaker than the HyperCoil, that they require more coils to achieve the same rate. This also creates another problem. Travel is cut down significantly. Since the springs will compress at the same rate, given that they are both 450 lbs, QA1 will bottom out first, since it has more coils, creating coil bind condition, and costing traction in that corner. I used to think that coilover springs were coilover springs. As long as the rate and length is the same, then the springs will be identical. I just found out that's not the case.</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]21706[/ATTACH]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ReplicaR, post: 1284190, member: 9209"] So, I've an interesting discovery the other day. Below are two springs, one from QA1 (silver), the other is a Hypercoil (blue). Both are same length (10 inches), same rate (450lbs) and same inside diameter (2.5 inches). What's different is that QA1 spring has 10 coils, while the HyperCoil has only 7. This tells me that the metal in the QA1 is so much weaker than the HyperCoil, that they require more coils to achieve the same rate. This also creates another problem. Travel is cut down significantly. Since the springs will compress at the same rate, given that they are both 450 lbs, QA1 will bottom out first, since it has more coils, creating coil bind condition, and costing traction in that corner. I used to think that coilover springs were coilover springs. As long as the rate and length is the same, then the springs will be identical. I just found out that's not the case. [ATTACH=full]21706[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Random media
Latest posts
What Did You Do To Your Car Today?
Latest: RAU03MACH
Today at 6:39 PM
The Garage
New Mustang owner
Latest: RAU03MACH
Today at 6:24 PM
New Member Introductions
White95’s ‘09 F-250 “Chiron”
Latest: white95
Today at 5:19 PM
Build Ups & Projects
crown vic intermittent shut down
Latest: SnakeBit!
Today at 4:59 PM
96-04 - 2V Specific
Valve covers
Latest: RAU03MACH
Today at 10:10 AM
Community News
Share this page
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Forum statistics
Threads
78,612
Messages
1,537,442
Members
16,255
Latest member
jeffs mustang
Members online
chasingomas
Forums
Multimedia & Entertainment
Build Ups & Projects
ReplicaR's Mustang build *finally on track again*
Top