Terrorist 5.0
Member
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2023
- Messages
- 156
- Reaction score
- 31
Hello everyone, I have been doing some extensive research on springs for the SN95 cars but cannot find a conclusive answer. Here is my problem.
The car in question (1995 GT Coupe) came with lowering springs from the previous owner. He didn't know what they are and neither do I. I do know they are blue, which leads me to suspect they are H@R or Steeda according to most websites showing them as blue, but any spring can be powder coated. The issue is that they are pretty stiff (which I am sure there are other factors too that cause this), and the car scrapes the exhaust on speedbumps. On top of this, I put in some new emergency brake cables to get it to grab a little (which did help), and even with the cable support tabs bent all the way up, one of the cables are rubbed through to the metal. It still works, but I would imagine its gonna have way less of a service life now. Besides all that, the car is simply too low for me. I don't like the way it looks sitting that low.
So this leads me here. I want to get some springs that will raise the car back up some, maybe make it ride better and be less of a pain in the ass during real world use. I wanted to keep the car using all Ford parts as much as I can so I stumbled across the Ford Performance C/B springs. They are relatively inexpensive, ride nicely in the case of the B spring that I had my eye on, and are Ford parts, which check off all my boxes. My one issue is that according to the website, they lower all 1979-2004 Mustangs (minus the IRS Cobras) 0.875" in the front, and 0.5" in the back. With the height that the early SN95s left the factory at, sounds good to me. But then I looked into it more, and many people reported drops of up to double the specs, with some also reporting terrible reliability (although I'm sure there is a reason for that). The pictures I saw showed me the same thing. They are known to be low, especially in the front, even with the isolators in. Now, the site specifies all 1979-2004 Mustangs, so I am sure there is a weight difference between the Foxbody and the SN95, and then the switch from the 302 to the 4.6 in 1996.
This doesn't take the B springs off the table for me just yet as I am sure I can find a way to raise the car regardless, but I was thinking about New Edge springs. Somewhere on one of the forums, someone posted a chart with measurements in their experience, and I found something rather interesting. B springs were listed as a 1.5" drop in the front, and 0.75" drop in the back. Too much for me in the front. Then I noticed the New Edge Bullitt and Mach 1 springs offer a 0.75" drop all the way around. So I want to look into that.
Anyway, thanks everyone for any help in advance, and if any of you have an SN95 on B or C springs (or anything that isn't too low) please post some pictures, along with a short description of the set up. It would be a huge help.
The car in question (1995 GT Coupe) came with lowering springs from the previous owner. He didn't know what they are and neither do I. I do know they are blue, which leads me to suspect they are H@R or Steeda according to most websites showing them as blue, but any spring can be powder coated. The issue is that they are pretty stiff (which I am sure there are other factors too that cause this), and the car scrapes the exhaust on speedbumps. On top of this, I put in some new emergency brake cables to get it to grab a little (which did help), and even with the cable support tabs bent all the way up, one of the cables are rubbed through to the metal. It still works, but I would imagine its gonna have way less of a service life now. Besides all that, the car is simply too low for me. I don't like the way it looks sitting that low.
So this leads me here. I want to get some springs that will raise the car back up some, maybe make it ride better and be less of a pain in the ass during real world use. I wanted to keep the car using all Ford parts as much as I can so I stumbled across the Ford Performance C/B springs. They are relatively inexpensive, ride nicely in the case of the B spring that I had my eye on, and are Ford parts, which check off all my boxes. My one issue is that according to the website, they lower all 1979-2004 Mustangs (minus the IRS Cobras) 0.875" in the front, and 0.5" in the back. With the height that the early SN95s left the factory at, sounds good to me. But then I looked into it more, and many people reported drops of up to double the specs, with some also reporting terrible reliability (although I'm sure there is a reason for that). The pictures I saw showed me the same thing. They are known to be low, especially in the front, even with the isolators in. Now, the site specifies all 1979-2004 Mustangs, so I am sure there is a weight difference between the Foxbody and the SN95, and then the switch from the 302 to the 4.6 in 1996.
This doesn't take the B springs off the table for me just yet as I am sure I can find a way to raise the car regardless, but I was thinking about New Edge springs. Somewhere on one of the forums, someone posted a chart with measurements in their experience, and I found something rather interesting. B springs were listed as a 1.5" drop in the front, and 0.75" drop in the back. Too much for me in the front. Then I noticed the New Edge Bullitt and Mach 1 springs offer a 0.75" drop all the way around. So I want to look into that.
Anyway, thanks everyone for any help in advance, and if any of you have an SN95 on B or C springs (or anything that isn't too low) please post some pictures, along with a short description of the set up. It would be a huge help.