Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Multimedia & Entertainment
The Garage
Arguments about N/A vs. Boost
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ferocious" data-source="post: 964740" data-attributes="member: 15502"><p>At the moment, that seems like the more logical and simplest for me. A PI intake and some boost and around what numbers should i be seeing?</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>I don't have the time to do an motor swap on this car. I'm almost positive an engine swap is out of the picture <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite3" alt=":(" title="Frown :(" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":(" /></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>At my age, boost seems easier though. It just seems much more simpler to bolt on a turbo, tune it, maybe upgrade my injectors, and call it done. </p><p>I feel like with the limited experience and knowledge I have on motors, I'd be better off building a strong, reliable n/a engine when i have more experience, money, and time.</p><p></p><p>Boost seems like a simple way to have more fun with my car, and that's all i'm really aiming for right now. At first i considered going n/a because it seemed cheaper, but it appears i'm wrong..</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ferocious, post: 964740, member: 15502"] At the moment, that seems like the more logical and simplest for me. A PI intake and some boost and around what numbers should i be seeing? I don't have the time to do an motor swap on this car. I'm almost positive an engine swap is out of the picture :( At my age, boost seems easier though. It just seems much more simpler to bolt on a turbo, tune it, maybe upgrade my injectors, and call it done. I feel like with the limited experience and knowledge I have on motors, I'd be better off building a strong, reliable n/a engine when i have more experience, money, and time. Boost seems like a simple way to have more fun with my car, and that's all i'm really aiming for right now. At first i considered going n/a because it seemed cheaper, but it appears i'm wrong.. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Random media
Latest posts
Post A Pic Of Your Latest Purchase Thread...
Latest: RAU03MACH
Today at 2:42 PM
The Garage
What Did You Do To Your Car Today?
Latest: shovel
Today at 1:48 PM
The Garage
M
1994 mustang key turned nothing happens
Latest: MasterDot
Today at 12:03 PM
94-95 5.0 - Specific
New Member from Virginia
Latest: Daryl
Yesterday at 8:55 PM
New Member Introductions
D
TKX shifter position
Latest: dsrtjeeper
Yesterday at 2:54 PM
Drivetrain
Share this page
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Forum statistics
Threads
78,534
Messages
1,535,741
Members
16,186
Latest member
Armand
Members online
No members online now.
Forums
Multimedia & Entertainment
The Garage
Arguments about N/A vs. Boost
Top