Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Engine Specific Tech
94-95 5.0 - Specific
Coolant temp 220+
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="shovel" data-source="post: 1589382" data-attributes="member: 29855"><p>It's probably worth reminding ourselves that conservation of energy isn't just a good idea - it's the law. An idling 500 horsepower SBF and an idling 200 horsepower SBF should produce almost the same amount of heat because they both have roughly the same amount of friction to overcome in order to spin 750 rpm and turn the accessories. For the same reason a 500 horsepower Mustang and a stock Mustang should produce the same amount of heat cruising at any given speed because the rolling and air resistance of the car itself is about the same. </p><p></p><p>Some parts add up, like bigger valves are probably heavier (slightly more work to slam them open), high rpm springs require more work to push open, wider tires push more air out of the way and have higher rolling resistance - on the other hand a free flowing exhaust should permit some improvement in evacuation of heat energy from under the hood.. but lowering a car means there's less room for the hot air to get out under the car. </p><p></p><p>Having said all that, hundreds of thousands of people have done all sorts of things to modify their Mustangs and most of them don't have heat problems and don't need to run special coolant or undertake other bizarre measures to deal with it. </p><p></p><p>Since you said you're using the stock sensor, is it possible the stock sensor is calibrated differently from the Holley one and maybe your temps are fine just being displayed wrong?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="shovel, post: 1589382, member: 29855"] It's probably worth reminding ourselves that conservation of energy isn't just a good idea - it's the law. An idling 500 horsepower SBF and an idling 200 horsepower SBF should produce almost the same amount of heat because they both have roughly the same amount of friction to overcome in order to spin 750 rpm and turn the accessories. For the same reason a 500 horsepower Mustang and a stock Mustang should produce the same amount of heat cruising at any given speed because the rolling and air resistance of the car itself is about the same. Some parts add up, like bigger valves are probably heavier (slightly more work to slam them open), high rpm springs require more work to push open, wider tires push more air out of the way and have higher rolling resistance - on the other hand a free flowing exhaust should permit some improvement in evacuation of heat energy from under the hood.. but lowering a car means there's less room for the hot air to get out under the car. Having said all that, hundreds of thousands of people have done all sorts of things to modify their Mustangs and most of them don't have heat problems and don't need to run special coolant or undertake other bizarre measures to deal with it. Since you said you're using the stock sensor, is it possible the stock sensor is calibrated differently from the Holley one and maybe your temps are fine just being displayed wrong? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Random media
Latest posts
4.6l 2v PI tuning, how to just make it run?
Latest: 07GtS197
45 minutes ago
Engine Swap
R
Our little japanese Mustang in the wilds of Germany
Latest: rezor
50 minutes ago
Members Rides
Vibrations at 80+
Latest: RAU03MACH
Today at 2:34 PM
Drivetrain
Converting a small block 94/95 from MPFI to TBI - in case anyone else wants to go this route
Latest: RAU03MACH
Today at 2:24 PM
94-95 5.0 - Specific
C
radiator fan on start up?
Latest: chasingomas
Today at 1:47 PM
96-04 - 2V Specific
Share this page
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Forum statistics
Threads
78,589
Messages
1,536,892
Members
16,227
Latest member
Aviator19xx
Members online
ju015dd
95 Blue GT
ttocs
shovel
Forums
Engine Specific Tech
94-95 5.0 - Specific
Coolant temp 220+
Top