Stopsign32v said:
Great choice!!! Nothing like a cam with 1982 era specs and technology! :uglystupid2:
Camshafts in 1982 were flat tappets, not a roller like this cam. So much for the "technology" comment. Also the spec's in 1982 were 260*/274* seat to seat and .416 and .444 lift as opposed to 282*/282* seat to seat and .498" lift intake and exhaust for the E303 cam. Do you have
any clue what you are talking about?
And something I see a lot is a misunderstanding of the term "stall". Stall is a feature or specification of a torque converter. What you choose and buy is a torque converter. Sometimes you need a torque converter with a higher stall specification based on cam and rear gear choice. It's like when selecting another cam. You don't say "I need a lift", you say that you need a camshaft. That's why it is incorrect to say "I need a stall". Just a pet peeve of mine.
The E-303 cam should work great with minimal other modifications. Of course as with any improved cam, improved induction will maximize its affect. You should notice an improvements anyways. It's not a world beater but it will be more fun on the street. :thumb:
Steve