Yeah, look what they did to the Mustang by electrifying it. Looks like a huge turd!
Exactly what I was going to say. Why didn't they just call it something other then a mustang mach e...
Yeah, look what they did to the Mustang by electrifying it. Looks like a huge turd!
in time they will be but it is just all new technology that requires a change to everything from how homes are wired up to be able to charge them(even though they do not recommend charging inside the houseWouldn’t hurt if they made them affordable to regular, blue collar Joe’s, too. (Hybrid and electric). You want me to “Go Green, help the environment, become less dependent on oil, blah blah blah”… then make it affordable AND reliable/dependable.
Yell out something like, "Still got a while to wait, buddy! See ya down the road!"
Exactly what I was going to say. Why didn't they just call it something other then a mustang mach e...
I hear ya. I won't be restricted on range, I won't live in a "15 minute city", and I won't eat bugs.
I beep and wave at every electric car that is plugged into a charger in any random parking lot.
If your mustang won’t get 130 miles to a tank of gas, you have problems. That is a 20-25 mpg car, easily. My mustang now averages 21mpg and I get about 340 miles to a tank.Agreed. Just call it the Mach E, or simply the Mustang II, because that’s what it is, the right car for the right time. People hate on the Mustang II today, but in the late 70s, they were somewhat popular. They needed something with decent fuel economy. Plus, it was a way to continue on the Mustang name, rather than kill it off like the Camaro was in the early aughts.
What on earth are you talking about? Most EVs today have about a 200-300 range. My 94 Mustang won’t even do 130. Range on that sucks! There are plug in hybrids with worse range, like 20-60, but it uses gas to generate electricity to extend that range, giving it an INSANE fuel economic range. I suggest anyone who has range anxiety to buy one of those first. And if your daily commute is 200-300 miles one way, and you CANT recharge, then sure, an EV isn’t right for you. Plug in hybrid though still may be worth looking into however.
Why? That’s stupid. They’re probably not even there. I don’t honk at every mofo getting gas. God. Everyone would hate me if I did that.
I think none of you people know/understand what fast charging is. So, for example, I drove an EV from Dallas to Houston and back. I used fast chargers about as often as I would fill up an ICE, and only because the car was a 2015 model, therefore did not have the range newer models of today had. I charged at actual physical gas stations. Me and my child went to the bathroom, had a meal, then left. On long road trips with a family, tell me you do not spend about 30 minutes at a stop, especially at travel centers like these were. Our stops may have been longer than 30, but only because we had lunch there. You guys still eat meals on road trips, right? Well there’s your extra 30 minutes.
Oh, and I do feel like I need to mention our TX-NM-CO trip we had last June. We didn’t want to deal with plotting out our trip, worrying whether or not a charging station was there, functioning, and didn’t have some jerk blocking it like somehow EVs were going to destroy his entire way of life if he didn’t inconvenience some people, so we rented a car. We came across a gas station littered with vehicles. I just needed to pee, but it was so busy because everyone there wanted gas, but the supply truck never came. People were trying to figure out if they had enough to make it to the next town. Our rental was a Camry, so we were fine. Everyone else: range anxiety.
On the way back home, I needed to pee again. Came across a town, but they wouldn’t let me inside. Not a single business in town would let me inside to pee. Reason? No electricity. Being the only town for hundreds of miles, they had several gas stations, only no electricity means no power at the pumps. Yes, an EV could potentially have a problem, but I’m bringing this up because people are always quick to use this as a defense, not realizing that they can’t refuel without power as well. During Snowmageddon 2021, it was the EVs that could be driven, while ICE vehicles could not because even with the power back on, supplies were low, or other systems were down, so they could not purchase the fuel.
I had one issue in my Mustang where the power was on, but they couldn’t get the pumps back on and operational. Big deal, I’ll go to the next one. Next one, the owner came out yelling at me about how I stole this other guys gas. Not “I’m sorry, but the wrong pump was activated” just straight up “You stole!!!” I put my card in and pumped it like I usually do, unlike the guy I somehow magically stole from a completely different pump. …but that does bring up another road trip story…
TX-FL, we rented another car, and again, I needed to pee. We try to get gas anytime we pull over, but the place was packed!!! No one was in their cars. No one even had the pump in the inlet, so no one was getting gas either!!! I was there for half an hour, because again, family, and no one left! Basically what was happening was that people were prepaying but not at the pump, they planned to prepay inside. No one was checking out at the time. 30 minutes, no gas! Apparently it’s the only station for a lengthy way, so same situation!!! Thankfully, it was a fuel efficient car again, so we were able to make it to another station but I shouldn’t keep getting range anxiety with a gas car!!! That’s the whole point of renting!!! This was the reverse of ICEing BTW. Instead of blocking EVs from charging, people were blocking ICEs from refueling. Both should be illegal, especially if you consider how much money that gas station would have made in just those 30 minutes alone.
I have to giggle because I bet when the first horseless carriages came out that all the old fuckers were sitting around talking about how much of a pain they are, how they can catch fire, how much better their horses are for not needing to find a gas station. Driving by honking/waving while in a mustang, we have come so far huh?
Yeah, I have seen several ICEs catch fire out in the wild. The only EVs I’ve seen are only in the news. When a vehicle that literally functions by producing thousands of micro explosions catches fire, it’s not really newsworthy. But in the super rare event an EV catches fire, it becomes national news, sometimes international. And they usually catch fire because they were previously involved in some horrific accident. That’s why when certain vehicles, like Teslas, become salvaged, they disable your access to their supercharger network. This is because if that risky vehicle does catch fire, not only does it damage equipment and other vehicles, but it will be in national news, and that’s not the type of PR they want. They would rather be known for having that crazy psychotic South African paypal guy for a CEO, than an actual fire. There have been tons of gas stations that caught fire though. Not newsworthy beyond local. Remember when they didn’t even want you to be on your phone, due to fears of sparking up a gas fire?I'm not going to be the sucker whose EV catches fire in his own garage. I got my 2018 Fusion Hybrid and I love it. Just never going full EV. They are not saving the planet, if anything they are harming it. And another reason not to buy the latest generation car is because it's going to be fully connected if not already. I'll keep my oldies running forever.
If your mustang won’t get 130 miles to a tank of gas, you have problems. That is a 20-25 mpg car, easily. My mustang now averages 21mpg and I get about 340 miles to a tank.
I have no problem with people wanting an electric car, just don’t force the rest of the world to do it because you want to do it.
We all really need to live and let live, stop trying to control one another. This isn’t directed at anyone here specifically, just a general statement in regards to the mindset of the general populous today.
I was just watching a vid on the cybertruck and there are so many pieces on it that I see being specialized and big $$$$ when they need to be replaced. For instance the tires are specific to the truck so the wheel covers fit into them, I am afraid to know what that special tire costs. The next thing I saw was that they were bragging about the windshield and how it is the biggest piece of automotive glass made. Because of the size it is made from a special type of glass/composite that is supposed to be hard to chip, but not impossible. When I lived in phoenix I had glass insurance coverage on all my cars because about 2-4 times per year you will be going down the highway and the car in front of you will kick up a piece of the decomposed granite cobble they like to put on the side of the highways and crack your windshield. I am can only imagine what they will get to replace that big old sucker and recalibrate the computer/cameras after parts/labor is included.
I don’t want to argue, but I’m telling you with absolute certainty that your 302 can get over 20 mpg with no problems. I have been involved with more than a few builds. The most recent was a good friend’s car. It was a 95 gt with a 302, edelbrock heads, E303 cam, T5, and 4.56 gears. Even had a carburetor swapped on it. That car got 26 mpg with the ac on.Bull! The 94 GT got 17 city/27 hwy, and those epa ratings were always lies. The v6 got 19 city/29 hwy, and back when it was a fully stock v6, the best I ever got was 22mpg all highway! And I’ve had this since 1998, so I am aware of the cars history. I don’t think I ever got 300 miles, but I also didn’t drive it dry. Filled up at 1/4 or 1/8 left. Only getting 10-12 gallons at a time.
My Mustang is now a modified v8, but pretty much everything on it is new, accept the idle control valve, which has 196k miles on it, and I plan on replacing. I recently replaced the injectors, and saw a HUGE improvement, but the fuel economy was the same.
So here’s the reality: you CANT force people to drive EVs. Although I do think they should at least test drive one before forming an opinion. You can pass legislation to force manufacturers to only produce electric cars, but guess what? Trucks and SUVs always get exemptions. That’s why corporations have tricked consumers into believing they NEED a truck to go grocery shopping and take the kids to school. So the mentality is already there. People will just continue buying vehicles they don’t really need because now that will be the only way to own a brand new ICE.
But what about all the old ones? They can do a horrific cash for clunkers program, but really they can’t take your car away, the same way Obama/Biden/whatever evil liberal commie is in power couldn’t take away your guns. To have that much waste piling up would have a reverse effect on helping the environment. Now, in other countries, there have been talks about actual mandatory surveillance. Like, no one will insurance you if you don’t have your car tattling on your driving behavior constantly. I think this is a Germany thing, but it’s still interesting to follow to see where it will actually go, because if you won’t/can’t install these devices on older vehicles, you essentially can’t insure the car with anyone. Imagine not being able to register your mustang because you don’t have an OBDII port. In our country, there are exemptions depending on the age of the vehicle, on things like seat belts and number of lights. One would assume they would do the same a grandfather them in anyway.
I don’t want to argue, but I’m telling you with absolute certainty that your 302 can get over 20 mpg with no problems. I have been involved with more than a few builds. The most recent was a good friend’s car. It was a 95 gt with a 302, edelbrock heads, E303 cam, T5, and 4.56 gears. Even had a carburetor swapped on it. That car got 26 mpg with the ac on.
Heck, my old f150 with a 302 got 20mpg. Granted, it was stock, but it was in an extended cab truck.