Steven said:I'd run a bigger set of heads.
Steven said:I'd run a bigger set of heads.
Venom351R said:Steven said:I'd run a bigger set of heads.
What would you put 185's on then b/c this is the second post Ive seen where you said 185 AFR's are "to small" for something? The AFR 185's are a pretty aggressive flowing head. they come gasket port matched from the factory. 185's are to big for a 302, for a 331 stroker or a 351 they are a great fit. If it was a stroked 351 a bigger head like the 205 would be better.
Paul said:The only "small" stroker I know running a set of 205s is my friend Justin. However, he's got a PT91 and the car makes 933 rwhp on his 347. I think the 185s would be just fine.![]()
BOS-94-003 said:When building an engine your never going to satisfy everyone (not that that is that my intention) but the head selection debate does spark my curiosity. Think ill shoot Jim an email and see what he suggests. Thanks for the positive remarks everyone and also for the input.
Steven said:Venom351R said:Steven said:I'd run a bigger set of heads.
What would you put 185's on then b/c this is the second post Ive seen where you said 185 AFR's are "to small" for something? The AFR 185's are a pretty aggressive flowing head. they come gasket port matched from the factory. 185's are to big for a 302, for a 331 stroker or a 351 they are a great fit. If it was a stroked 351 a bigger head like the 205 would be better.
We've been through this man in that thread where JR, Paul, and quite a few others got involved in the technical discussion over heads. If you want great USEABLE and driveable power, a larger set of heads with smaller not extremely aggressive cam will seriously impress over the smaller heads/larger cam combination. I've seen 185's on a stock bottom end car. They aren't that big.