Backpressure question

Stella94GT

New Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2008
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
it is my understanding that a mild car actualy needs backpressure for the best performance is that correct? My exhaust combo is long tubes, o/r x, and straight pipes so basicaly no restiction. im woundering if it will net me any hp to weld in some mufflers?
 

ryclef331

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2006
Messages
2,913
Reaction score
11
Stella94GT said:
it is my understanding that a mild car actualy needs backpressure for the best performance is that correct? My exhaust combo is long tubes, o/r x, and straight pipes so basicaly no restiction. im woundering if it will net me any hp to weld in some mufflers?

It may net you a couple of ponies across the board but nothing to write home about. Its all preference. There is a restriction just having an exhaust on the car. Mufflers are up to you...you won't notice or feel any difference I'd bet
 

topless95

Active Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2008
Messages
950
Reaction score
1
too little restriction/ no restriction will diminish/eliminate the positive effects of exhaust scavenging
 

golden5.0

New Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2008
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
back pressure usually helps the car make more torque down low and in the middlerpms. Less restriction frees up horsepower in the higher rpms. I would put some mufflers on you will feel the difference I had the car without mufflers for around two weeks once and felt the difference when i slapped some on.
 

ryclef331

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2006
Messages
2,913
Reaction score
11
golden5.0 said:
back pressure usually helps the car make more torque down low and in the middlerpms. Less restriction frees up horsepower in the higher rpms. I would put some mufflers on you will feel the difference I had the car without mufflers for around two weeks once and felt the difference when i slapped some on.


There is a difference between running open headers and a full exhaust with no mufflers though. If he is running the exhaust all the way out the back with no mufflers, slapping a set on is going to have minimal gains...less than 8hp and 10lbft of tq difference. I'd bet money on it. Anything pretty much under 20hp...your "a$$" dyno isn't going to feel it. You dyno and ET numbers can improve yes...but your calibrated butt isn't that accurate. I don't care who you are.
 

Mr. OAM

Active Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2007
Messages
780
Reaction score
0
Wait a minute! People here and at other message boards feel the 5 - 15 HP gain they get from their underdrive pullies all the time!! :hammer: And that is considered money well spent.


Steve
 

ryclef331

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2006
Messages
2,913
Reaction score
11
Mr. OAM said:
Wait a minute! People here and at other message boards feel the 5 - 15 HP gain they get from their underdrive pullies all the time!! :hammer: And that is considered money well spent.


Steve

I hate when people tell me that. I want to do back to back tests...5 passes...no times displayed on the same car, same driver. I will randomly install and uninstall a set of underdrives and the driver has to make 5 passes and guess which passes are with or without pullies. I'd bet MONEY on it he doesn't get all of them right.
 

golden5.0

New Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2008
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
well before My underdrive crank on my Auto vert my previous best was a 14.8 @ 94.5mph and since its auto I hit those times over and over on cool nights. After the underdrive I have a best of 14.6 @ 95.98 and again hit those times all the time on cool nights.
 
OP
OP
S

Stella94GT

New Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2008
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
thanks for the opinions guys, i actualy emailed summit in their tech section and asked the same thing but they still havnt gotten back to me. i actualy love how the car sounds. my mind set for the car is that every little bit help so when i finish up my exhaust this spring i might just get a pair of mufflers welded on.

i know it is basicaly all sound preference but is there a muffler that out performs the rest?
 

ryclef331

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2006
Messages
2,913
Reaction score
11
golden5.0 said:
well before My underdrive crank on my Auto vert my previous best was a 14.8 @ 94.5mph and since its auto I hit those times over and over on cool nights. After the underdrive I have a best of 14.6 @ 95.98 and again hit those times all the time on cool nights.

I'm not disputing that fact. In BLACK AND WHITE (i.e timeslips and dyno charts) hell yeah there is a difference. I'm just saying that a person's "seat of the pants feeling" isn't going to notice a difference in hp of 10-20hp. Thats all. YES there IS more power there but the differences aren't that noticible. Hell, the first time I sprayed nitrous, a 50shot, EVER, I braced myself for dear life expecting my seat back to break the hell off but I hit it and said...wait....something is wrong. It is just not accurate to say "oh man...It feels like I picked up probably 12 more horse."
 

Mr. OAM

Active Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2007
Messages
780
Reaction score
0
I'd love to see the guy that can say at the end of the run "Hey, that felt .2 of a second faster." :coolsmiley:

There's also the "placebo effect".



Steve
 

golden5.0

New Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2008
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Mr. OAM said:
I'd love to see the guy that can say at the end of the run "Hey, that felt .2 of a second faster." :coolsmiley:

There's also the "placebo effect".



Steve

youre right I didnt feel a big difference in the underdrive. But with the mufflers wow it was huge maybe because its an automatic but it was horrible down low and when I put my flows back on I felt a huge difference.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
78,541
Messages
1,535,876
Members
16,190
Latest member
96GTPlanB

Members online

Top