I've seen twin supercharged cars but the superchargers were both rotrex (similar setup to centrifugal). There was a separate belt to each blower and the tubing was symmetrical leading into 2 top mounted intercoolers (mounted on the top of both valve covers) and finally into the intake.
I think that'll work pretty well. I've seen turbos feeding the roots style blower on a few cars before with pretty outstanding results. as long as it gets a good tune it should be good to go.
Thats pretty frigen nasty.. I hope hes got more than a stock bottom end, i know they're pretty strong but thatll definetly push its limits.... personally I would of spent the money on a kenne bell or whipple or something but its still pretty sick
I am very skeptical of this set up. The Eaton is known for heat soak problems under higher boost presures. He is putting forced induction directly into the Eaton with no way of cooling the air first. So now he is putting hot air into a supercharger that is known for heat soak problems. I think he will be very disapointed.
IMO, its a waste to put a procharger (which more than likely outflows the Eaton) feeding the Eaton....take the eaton off, get the Procharger sheetmetal upper intake, and pulley up the Procharger.....
Seems like this setup is more restriction and heat than being practical. Not to mention the nightmare of trying to get a belt around all of those pulleys without slipping or causing too much drag. Intercooled turbos feeding a huge blower so it isn't scavenging for air seems to be a better setup to me cause they have different things driving them.
Its Looks F$#$# badass and Its sickly original Cuz I know for shure thats never been done but Without building the short block I dont think that motor is going to be lasting too long and the Eaton will die even faster but still sick