justinschmidt1
Post Whore
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2006
- Messages
- 10,667
- Reaction score
- 428
I like how hes showing a 5.0s n/a torque curve compared to a 4.6 :hammer:
It's a stroked 4.6, aka a 5.0L modular engine-VT heads, custom comp cam grinds, full bolt ons. Read before you type. Stroking a modular doesn't help it a ton until you have boost or nitrous to take advantage of it.justinschmidt1 said:I like how hes showing a 5.0s n/a torque curve compared to a 4.6 :hammer:
Johnny Langton said:Your argument is absurd in this situation anyway-that article from the toilet paper rag in your previous post is from a "T" trim Vortech that is designed to make HP in the high RPM range for race engines,not the more street designed "S" trim. That comparison is also on a car with an intake designed for a roots blower-the Vortech kit simply uses an adapter plate-no wonder it's low on torque-the runners on that intake are all of about 4" long.
Johnny Langton said:I OWN a N/A car that makes approx 300rwhp,and I've driven many other stone stock NPI modulars that have had a simply box-stock S-trim intake,and they ALL made 320-340rwhp with a correct tune installed, They also make lots more torque all over the place vs my heavily modified N/A engine.
This whole argument is stupid. Your point,while a decent one,is twisted by these "articles" you've read or seen that are lopsided in one way or another. You don't see the big picture.
JL
You're a fucking idiot. I give up.Shocker98GT said:It's a stroked 4.6, aka a 5.0L modular engine-VT heads, custom comp cam grinds, full bolt ons. Read before you type. Stroking a modular doesn't help it a ton until you have boost or nitrous to take advantage of it.justinschmidt1 said:I like how hes showing a 5.0s n/a torque curve compared to a 4.6 :hammer:
justinschmidt1 said:exactly....why dont we compare a 5.4s torque curve to a boosted 4.6 why were at it.
justinschmidt1 said:Im confused at what your looking at?
Im looking at both the graphs and the torque curves are pretty much the same except the supercharged NPI looks stronger from 3-4k.
the problem with this comparison is that a boosted car can always make so much more power. 267 rwhp out of a blown npi is weak...why?
the thing is like stock pushin what? 6 psi? throw just a pi intake and bump the boost up and hes making 330-340 rwhp.
I would expect a PI car with u/d's and long tubes to have a nice torque curve...that cars torque curve looks very healthy...much healthier than other pi dynos I have seen.
the NPI still looks stronger to me :dunno: