1998 mustang gt vs 2006 gto

nesqwick_05

Active Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2006
Messages
757
Reaction score
1
if its burning your eyes, u might wanna change ur oil before the gasoline dilutes that shit and u mess up ur motor
 

Jrgunn5150

Post Whore
Joined
Jun 29, 2007
Messages
12,273
Reaction score
2
Nice runs, take your rev limiter down from 7k though.

What M6 GTO's do best is spit out half shaft's, lol
 
OP
OP
J

joshmartin

Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2007
Messages
117
Reaction score
0
if the cams have been changed and its a preety radical cam like it seems to be wouldnt the valve springs of had to been changed? it pulls to 7k and wants to pull more tho hahaha :santa_grin: kaboooooom is in this motors near future hahaha
 

Jrgunn5150

Post Whore
Joined
Jun 29, 2007
Messages
12,273
Reaction score
2
The valve springs SHOULD have been changed, lol. That's what I mean, that and you still have to assume you have stock weak/sucky rods and bolts that can't handle that either.
 

voidfinger

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2006
Messages
3,880
Reaction score
0
very nice, i like to see this kinda stuff. I wouldnt mind riding in your car to see how it pulls. It seems to be a totally different game than my npi lol.
 
OP
OP
J

joshmartin

Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2007
Messages
117
Reaction score
0
it will be in mooresville , at prodyno in 3 weeks for a tune and the 150 shot tune lol
 

voidfinger

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2006
Messages
3,880
Reaction score
0
o really, moorsville is right down the road. I might deffinitly come see that thing lol. Send me a pm lol.
 
OP
OP
J

joshmartin

Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2007
Messages
117
Reaction score
0
no doubt, we gonna trailer it down incase it blows on the dyno lol we call it project junktang lol :snow_laugh:
 
OP
OP
J

joshmartin

Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2007
Messages
117
Reaction score
0
if it makes 280 or more on motor after a tune ill be happy, then add the 150 shot should be a lil over 400whp
 
OP
OP
J

joshmartin

Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2007
Messages
117
Reaction score
0
wet, probably with a aluminum lower intake , still need to put a walrbro 255 in the tank and colder plugs.... this thing has stock headers and udp , mass air housing and sensor, and a shity mac xpipe too lol
 

voidfinger

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2006
Messages
3,880
Reaction score
0
lol nothing wrong with the mass air housing and sensor. unless your going supercharged. And whats wrong with mac mid pipes? shit i like mine lol. Naw but it makes some damn power though lol.
 

justinschmidt1

Post Whore
Joined
Dec 4, 2006
Messages
10,663
Reaction score
430
I beleive it...If I had full pi swap and some radical cams I think I would beat em too.

I raced a ls2 from a 60-120 and he only pulled about a car and a half.

Maybe it has something to do with the fact that theyre probably pushing 4500 pounds with driver and gas.
 
OP
OP
J

joshmartin

Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2007
Messages
117
Reaction score
0
MY car is nowhere near full potential and wont be until a tune, also goats weigh 3780lbs with full options ... they arent that heavy lol eitherway they only got like 80 cubic inches on us so ill take a win anyways i can gget it when im that far outnumbered in cubic inches
 

Jrgunn5150

Post Whore
Joined
Jun 29, 2007
Messages
12,273
Reaction score
2
ROFL, you have to be a massive fat ass to push that to 4500 still, lol. Gas weighs 7-8 pounds a gallon.
 

Jrgunn5150

Post Whore
Joined
Jun 29, 2007
Messages
12,273
Reaction score
2
xsoutherngun89x said:
damn! for real? i ran 14.3 with nearly a full tank! lol

Glad I didn't say you'd have to be a fool to fill your tank then go to the track, lol.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
78,554
Messages
1,536,116
Members
16,201
Latest member
jgib8795

Members online

Top