1998 mustang gt vs 2006 gto

nesqwick_05

Active Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2006
Messages
757
Reaction score
1
if its burning your eyes, u might wanna change ur oil before the gasoline dilutes that shit and u mess up ur motor
 

Jrgunn5150

Post Whore
Joined
Jun 29, 2007
Messages
12,273
Reaction score
2
Nice runs, take your rev limiter down from 7k though.

What M6 GTO's do best is spit out half shaft's, lol
 
OP
OP
J

joshmartin

Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2007
Messages
117
Reaction score
0
if the cams have been changed and its a preety radical cam like it seems to be wouldnt the valve springs of had to been changed? it pulls to 7k and wants to pull more tho hahaha :santa_grin: kaboooooom is in this motors near future hahaha
 

Jrgunn5150

Post Whore
Joined
Jun 29, 2007
Messages
12,273
Reaction score
2
The valve springs SHOULD have been changed, lol. That's what I mean, that and you still have to assume you have stock weak/sucky rods and bolts that can't handle that either.
 

voidfinger

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2006
Messages
3,880
Reaction score
0
very nice, i like to see this kinda stuff. I wouldnt mind riding in your car to see how it pulls. It seems to be a totally different game than my npi lol.
 
OP
OP
J

joshmartin

Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2007
Messages
117
Reaction score
0
it will be in mooresville , at prodyno in 3 weeks for a tune and the 150 shot tune lol
 

voidfinger

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2006
Messages
3,880
Reaction score
0
o really, moorsville is right down the road. I might deffinitly come see that thing lol. Send me a pm lol.
 
OP
OP
J

joshmartin

Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2007
Messages
117
Reaction score
0
no doubt, we gonna trailer it down incase it blows on the dyno lol we call it project junktang lol :snow_laugh:
 
OP
OP
J

joshmartin

Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2007
Messages
117
Reaction score
0
if it makes 280 or more on motor after a tune ill be happy, then add the 150 shot should be a lil over 400whp
 
OP
OP
J

joshmartin

Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2007
Messages
117
Reaction score
0
wet, probably with a aluminum lower intake , still need to put a walrbro 255 in the tank and colder plugs.... this thing has stock headers and udp , mass air housing and sensor, and a shity mac xpipe too lol
 

voidfinger

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2006
Messages
3,880
Reaction score
0
lol nothing wrong with the mass air housing and sensor. unless your going supercharged. And whats wrong with mac mid pipes? shit i like mine lol. Naw but it makes some damn power though lol.
 

justinschmidt1

Post Whore
Joined
Dec 4, 2006
Messages
10,663
Reaction score
430
I beleive it...If I had full pi swap and some radical cams I think I would beat em too.

I raced a ls2 from a 60-120 and he only pulled about a car and a half.

Maybe it has something to do with the fact that theyre probably pushing 4500 pounds with driver and gas.
 
OP
OP
J

joshmartin

Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2007
Messages
117
Reaction score
0
MY car is nowhere near full potential and wont be until a tune, also goats weigh 3780lbs with full options ... they arent that heavy lol eitherway they only got like 80 cubic inches on us so ill take a win anyways i can gget it when im that far outnumbered in cubic inches
 

Jrgunn5150

Post Whore
Joined
Jun 29, 2007
Messages
12,273
Reaction score
2
ROFL, you have to be a massive fat ass to push that to 4500 still, lol. Gas weighs 7-8 pounds a gallon.
 

Jrgunn5150

Post Whore
Joined
Jun 29, 2007
Messages
12,273
Reaction score
2
xsoutherngun89x said:
damn! for real? i ran 14.3 with nearly a full tank! lol

Glad I didn't say you'd have to be a fool to fill your tank then go to the track, lol.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
78,555
Messages
1,536,138
Members
16,201
Latest member
jgib8795

Members online

No members online now.
Top