bonestock3.8DTH
Well-Known Member
I haven't seen a 3v in a sn95 ever is their not enough room to fit it? or is it just the thought if you're going to do a head swap just got with 4v heads?
3v in a sn95
- Thread starter bonestock3.8DTH
- Start date
kissrocksforever
Active Member
I while ago someone on here did a 3v swap, cant remember who though. It's alot of work though.
bonestock3.8DTH
Well-Known Member
I see cause I mean you can make good power with them but if its s a struggle to get them in it'd be easier to go with a 4v
Ninety8stang
Well-Known Member
no one likes odd number valves. lol
but everyone loves boobies!!
CC'S95GT
Post Whore
yes but they DO come in pairs. like valves
duff daddy
Legend
The guy who did it got a whopping 300 wheel hp which is what I got with cams and intake. He also had someone install it and had to overcome the etc and other electronic issues....
Duffy rulz
duff daddy
Legend
white95 said:
fucken a right homie!
Marvin97
Well-Known Member
I don't remember him having any issues, other than needing a different hood. His 300rwhp was also made with a bone stock engine, stock exhaust and all. He did the swap cause his 2v crapped out on him.Duff Daddy said:
+1 for justifying a motor swap due to broken parts... Case in point, I needed a new oil pump in my 306 and after the dust settled I had a SVO block 410w lol
duff daddy
Legend
97whitevert said:
He didnt have issues but converting a throttle by cable and pretty basic obd II car to a motor with DBW and more sensors then 2 of our cars have doesnt just install wiht out a single hitch.
Yea a 3v with a tune intake and exhaust will make 300 wheel, I understand why he swapped it, still a shit motor in my opinion.
Marvin97
Well-Known Member
I did my swap cause my 2v spun a rod bearing.white95 said:
Some people would say the same thing about a 2v. Its all opinion really.Duff Daddy said:
Mikey94gt built his Boss block 310 after he spun a rod bearing... Interesting!
Only took an intake and CAMS? I wonder what a 4 valve would gain with an intake and cams?Duff Daddy said:
Interesting, the shop actually got it done? I forgot about that thread. How much did it end up costing (supposedly). Should have went 4 valve
I"d like to put the 3v from my 07 in my 99...with the weight savings I don't see why it wouldn't run 12.3's given a good 60'. I know the car has 12.50's in it right now but gotta work on the traction thing, not terrible considering it's a stock motor far better gas mileage than either of my 2v's.
duff daddy
Legend
97whitevert said:
And thats why I voiced mine.
Shame302 said:
1) for 3x's the money in terms of cams and valve springs.......
2) more then it was worth
Marvin97
Well-Known Member
I think the main difference in his swap versus most 4v swaps is he posted a considerable more amount of torque than a 4v would. Most 4v's won't make that much more torque than hp(if any), if I remember right he layed down about 340rwtq.
duff daddy
Legend
you and I both know the #'s are very very dependant on who does the pull, temp, air ect. also some people go for peak #'s and some people make crazy numbers which they should never have. I can think of a few on here like that.
Dyno numbers are for braggin rights.. ETs and trap speed tell the truth!
