Do I need a new driveshaft?

MyLittlePony

Active Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2009
Messages
894
Reaction score
503
Location
Dallas
I have a 1994 v6 rear end, a v6 drive shaft, and a v6 automatic transmission, but my engines a 5.0. I remember reading somewhere where people claimed you needed a new drive shaft when doing a swap, but mine worked fin anyway. My husband is literally on the way to pick up a new 8.8 rear end, will my current 3.8 driveshaft work with it??
 

wayne94mustang

Active Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2006
Messages
477
Reaction score
11
you'll be able to tell us soon...lol



if i had to guess i'd say it should be fine but for real, let us know.
 

kintek

Member
Joined
May 13, 2007
Messages
152
Reaction score
0
ok, you do not need to put a 8.8 in with a 5.0. Some of them came with a 7.5 rear as well. The driveshafts will fit just fine. I bought a aluminum for my stang when my old one went out. I can use it for the 5.0 or the 3.8 it dont matter.
 
OP
OP
MyLittlePony

MyLittlePony

Active Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2009
Messages
894
Reaction score
503
Location
Dallas
wayne94mustang said:
you'll be able to tell us soon...lol
but for real, let us know.
It works
kintek said:
ok, you do not need to put a 8.8 in with a 5.0.

Youre probably right... ...but I want this car to be RELIABLE. This car has 251rwhp and 291 tq.... ...it drove for only a few months before the t-lock in the 7.5 went. (and I never did any burnouts just because I was afraid of this.)
 

tommybunz

Active Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2007
Messages
524
Reaction score
0
Bull shit you get. The 8,8 the v6 rear won't hold long personal experience the shaft is fine
 

kintek

Member
Joined
May 13, 2007
Messages
152
Reaction score
0
MyLittlePony said:
kintek said:
ok, you do not need to put a 8.8 in with a 5.0.

Youre probably right... ...but I want this car to be RELIABLE. This car has 251rwhp and 291 tq.... ...it drove for only a few months before the t-lock in the 7.5 went. (and I never did any burnouts just because I was afraid of this.)

Yeah it is more reliable and can hold up to more rwhp and tq. I never understood why ford mixed some 5.0 with the 7.5 and 8.8 rear. I would of rather put the bigger rear in and left it.

I am most likely going to upgrade mine to that after sometime too. I had spidered my factory rear in the 7.5 last october doing a burnout. Never could accomplish that with the stock sixxer clutch, but I installed a 03 cobra clutch and it managed to kill the rear gears and stock drive shaft all at once. I lemped it home 25 miles with it slipping but atleast it was moving.
 
OP
OP
MyLittlePony

MyLittlePony

Active Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2009
Messages
894
Reaction score
503
Location
Dallas
kintek said:
Yeah it is more reliable and can hold up to more rwhp and tq. I never understood why ford mixed some 5.0 with the 7.5 and 8.8 rear. I would of rather put the bigger rear in and left it.
I dont understand this either... ...source? Not saying that I dont believe you. Its just that Im having a real tough time seeing ford actually do this... ...and NOT having to recall them all later. How do I know that those v8s that had them werent just replaced with them. Think about it, there are a lot of crooked and/or clueless mechnics out there. Also how do we not know that a previous owner didnt do the swap themself since they were going to sell/trade in the car anyway and stripped it for a bigger profit.

I am most likely going to upgrade mine to that after sometime too. I had spidered my factory rear in the 7.5 last october doing a burnout. Never could accomplish that with the stock sixxer clutch, but I installed a 03 cobra clutch and it managed to kill the rear gears and stock drive shaft all at once. I lemped it home 25 miles with it slipping but atleast it was moving.

Thats what happened to mine. It was loud, but still drove. Apparently it still worked, but the t-lock needed to be rebuild because it was now open and didnt control both wheels
 

kintek

Member
Joined
May 13, 2007
Messages
152
Reaction score
0
My source is a ford mechanic that worked there during the time our cars were built and left to work at dodge around january of this year. also had a sales man from the time say the 8.8 was a optional listing. ill try to find more info when i get home. cant look up stuff on the cell to well.
 
OP
OP
MyLittlePony

MyLittlePony

Active Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2009
Messages
894
Reaction score
503
Location
Dallas
kintek said:
here is a link that somewhat supports my statement. http://www.sb.net/wkeller/mustangs-faq/part-1.html
"7.5 Refers to the 7.5" rear-end used in earlier 5.0L Mustangs and all 4 and 6 cylinder Mustangs (not sure if this applies to the 1994 and later cars). "

Sounds like it may of been available to the foxbodies, but no confirmation on 94+. Perhaps ford did this on many GTs because back then they made anywhere from 140-205hp. And if you modified it to make more, you voided its warranty or it had pasted the warranty time/mileage limit, which is why there was no recall.
 

Paul

Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2007
Messages
9,859
Reaction score
255
I have never, in my life, seen an original V8 car without an 8.8 rear axle.

I'd never have a 7.5 axle backing up a V8 car that I planned to drive for any length of time.

Paul.
 
OP
OP
MyLittlePony

MyLittlePony

Active Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2009
Messages
894
Reaction score
503
Location
Dallas
LAFENATU said:
Paul,

79 foxes as well as 82-85 had 7.5" rears.

Well, technically Paul is right. Hes never seen one, and would never drive one.

I guess if that era of foxes are putting out 90s v6 HP, then I dont see an issue, and can see ford doing it... ...but as for SN-95 5.0s, I dont believe they came with them. In fact, every time I mention that I have/had one, people tend to question me on why on earth I did.
 

Paul

Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2007
Messages
9,859
Reaction score
255
I was speaking of the newer cars, but thanks for the clarification LAFENATU - that's an important point to make.

Either way... 7.5" rearend on a V8 mustang = nu bueno.
 

LAFENATU

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2007
Messages
3,555
Reaction score
1
Forget my name again Paul...lol

Gotcha..I took your statement the wrong way..haha.

I agree a 7.5" is just :tard: with the torque of a V8. Stock vs stock the 8.8" is 35% stronger then the 7.5"

-Rob
 

Paul

Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2007
Messages
9,859
Reaction score
255
I thought it was Rob - I just didn't want to call you by the wrong name and sound like a douche. :grin:
 

Forum statistics

Threads
78,533
Messages
1,535,705
Members
16,186
Latest member
Armand

Members online

No members online now.
Top