95opal
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2007
- Messages
- 4,008
- Reaction score
- 3,132
I'm not being confrontational, you're providing bad tech. Wrong tech. For example, you said:
You said your motor was "healthy" but later stated it made only 230 rwhp / 270 rwtq on the dyno.
That is not "healthy" as modified 302s go. It's rather anemic. Posting a picture of a car with sloppy suspension squatting on the rear tires is not indicative of its performance. It was probably a mid-14 second car at best, especially with 2.73s and an auto.
Making the additional changes you noted, (new upper, 24# injectors, SN95 MAF, CAI, long tubes, true duals (no balance pipe), electric fan, and of course the T5 and 8.8"/4.10s.) is STILL not going to make the car "healthy." It is a poster child for a mildly modified 5.0, and one which would NOT gain any performance benefit from a box or short runner intake.
You can have all the opinions you want, but correct engine combinations are a topic of fact, not opinion. It's an air pump. Reducing the air intake velocity on a mild 302, either with a single plane intake on a carbureted car, or a box/short runner setup on an EFI car, will make you lose power. As I mentioned before, this has been proven in dyno test after dyno test over and over and over again.
So please stop. Your tech is just wrong.
Paul.
Well stated.....box intakes are better suited for blown applications not bolt on 5 liters