THEPATRIOT
New Member
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2009
- Messages
- 35
- Reaction score
- 0
are the V6 Mustangs?I know the older V6's were turds,just wondering how the "94 and ups are???
How reliable...
- Thread starter THEPATRIOT
- Start date
duff daddy
Legend
had 2 94's one had head gasket issues at 188 and the other ahd 150 with a mushy trans... soo...but not to bad other then that.
atlanticblue98
Well-Known Member
the 94-95's had severe Headgasket problems and had a recall. 96-04's were much much better
other than that, extremely reliable engines.
mine has around 150,000 miles and runs like new
and if you every have any problems, they are insanely easy to work on. just think of it as a really small 5.0 without a distributor
other than that, extremely reliable engines.
mine has around 150,000 miles and runs like new
and if you every have any problems, they are insanely easy to work on. just think of it as a really small 5.0 without a distributor
red95r
Active Member
My 95 runs pretty well for a DD. It had trouble shifting into OD, but I changed the fluid and it shifts great.
Mine runs like new as well @ 132k.
Mine runs like new as well @ 132k.
g36 monkey
Post Whore
My 99 has almost 175 on it and still runs strong 
P51CrazyHorse
Member
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2009
- Messages
- 204
- Reaction score
- 0
204k + miles on mine now, and it still runs great. Needs O2 sensors (but any car will need those after so long), but doesn't smoke or leak anything!
Aside from normal wear parts, I haven't had to replace anything major on it. Brake pads, rotors, etc... and one belt tensioner.
Aside from normal wear parts, I haven't had to replace anything major on it. Brake pads, rotors, etc... and one belt tensioner.
In short, aside from some nagging head gasket issues in 94/95, they're very reliable. All Mustangs are, it's just the age of the car and how well they're maintained that ultimately determines the life of the car. Reason I say age is older parts, even with proper maintenace, like sensors, will fail over time.
