OnyxCobra said:
jmstang66 said:
honestly not a fan of putting verticals on the 94-95 cars..the horizontals are what make them unique
the engine is what makes them unique, it's like a hybrid if you will.
KB said:
If you have a 5.hoe put the horizontals back in. No need to give in to comformity to be like everyone else. Plus the horizontal tails makes your car look like it has a fat beefy ass.
wide rear wheels and tires make it look a lot more beefy than the taillights do imo. Horizontal tails on a stock wheel/tire car does not help with a wide look.
I believe the illusion of the horizontals making the car look wider is true to a point, but definitely not on a car of stock height and/or skinny tires.
I like the idea of keeping whatever came with the car, the way it is, but I'm not opposed to change. I've considered keeping horizontal sets that have passed through me. But I wouldnt run horizontals unless the car was dropped and had fat tires, unless the car was a 94-95 to begin with.
People always say "its the 5.0 signature" or the other way around for modulars, which is true, but you gotta remember, the v6 never changed to an OHC until 05, so its not like all 94/95's and all 96-98's tail lights identify what engine is in the car.