Performer RPM 2 vs. Cobra intake

[50Fanatic92]

Which one do you guys think would be better for my setup. Keep in mind that I have the stock hood but am lokin for a new one if needed also I am eventually going to get 1.7 roller rockers and 24#'s if that makes any difference. Thanks.

 

[94kingcbra]

Someone correct me if I'm wrong but the performer II should need a elbow adapter and will probably cost more but will outflow the cobra anyday...

 

[LAFENATU]

I would get the Performer RPM II over the Cobra Intake.

The Cobra Intake would be better for you NOW with what you have, but the Performer RPM II is the better choice if you ever decide to get a set of heads or FI/Nitrous.

 

[Paul]

The Cobra intake is better suited to your mildly modded car, and will very likely make more average power than the RPM II.

Paul.

 

[95opal]

I would get the Performer RPM II over the Cobra Intake.

The Cobra Intake would be better for you NOW with what you have, but the Performer RPM II is the better choice if you ever decide to get a set of heads or FI/Nitrous.

+1000000

 

[foss_94gt]

the cobra is a good intake, its flows really good and it looks stock

 

[snakesonastang]

I've had both intakes. I think for your mods a stock cobra intake would be great. It makes good bottom end torque. If you do upgrade your mods, just have the cobra ported. My cobra intake was ported and made over 350 hp on a 342. Since then I've added a supercharger and a RPM II. I can tell that I had more bottom end torque with the cobra intake. Both are really good intakes.

 

[94Snake]

i just recently switched from my stock cobra intake to a trickflow track heat and i feel a huge difference down low. On my GT40 heads and cobra intake and a 347 bottom end it made 300 rwhp and 347 rwtq at 5300 rpms.