AaRoN said:
Why is there an LS1 option in with Mustang engines? Why does everyone insist on comparing them? LS1's are highly overrated, they have shitty rod bolts and they "God-like" cylinder heads are only held down with 4 bolts compared to 11-13 on the Modular. I guess maybe it's because Chevy is SO damn smart.
4.6, 5.0; doesn't matter to me.
You're not serious right? Chevy is So damn smart... they've stuck with the same platform for a long time now, and have built and made it better... the downside to the Chevy's, is the 10 bolt rearend.... other than that.. HA! I love my Mustang, I've ALWAYS loved the '95 GT's, and i've always wanted one, BUT if somebody walked up to me right now, and said... "I'll trade you my Black '98-'02 Trans Am WS6 straight up, for your Mustang" the Mustang would be gone quicker than you can swap keys with each other... I think the LS based engines are far superior to the Mustangs be it 4.6 or 5.0, in that yeah, the aftermarket parts may cost a little more, but they also make more HP from the factory than our Mustangs... a H/C/I on a Camaro will blow away most modified mustangs(depending on the mods)
As far as Ford engines go, i'm all for the 5.0, as far as other car company's, i'd take the LS1, LS2, or the LSX engine...